CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 307Posttraumatic Stress Disorder ResearchChild and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional DevelopmentChild Abuse and Trauma

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 32 of the 33 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Children's predisaster functioning as a predictor of posttraumatic stress following Hurricane Andrew.

La Greca, Annette M., Silverman, Wendy K., Wasserstein, Shari B.·1998·Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology
DOI 10.1037/0022-006x.66.6.883
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

This study examined (a) children's predisaster behavioral and academic functioning as a predictor of posttraumatic stress (PTS) following Hurricane Andrew and (b) whether children who were exposed to the disaster would display a worsening of prior functioning. Fifteen months before the disaster, 92 4th through 6th graders provided self-reports of anxiety; peers and teachers rated behavior problems (anxiety, inattention, and conduct) and academic skills. Measures were repeated 3 months postdisaster; children also reported PTS symptoms and hurricane-related experiences (i.e., exposure). PTS symptoms were again assessed 7 months postdisaster. At 3 months postdisaster, children's exposure to the disaster, as well as predisaster ratings of anxiety, inattention, and academic skills, predicted PTS symptoms. By 7 months, only exposure, African American ethnicity, and predisaster anxiety predicted PTS. Prior anxiety levels also worsened as a result of exposure to the disaster. The findings have implications for identifying and treating children at risk for stress reactions following a catastrophic disaster.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/0022-006x.66.6.883

Cites

32 of 32 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 33 references

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 307

Related

Metadata

Authors
La Greca, A. M., Silverman, W. K., & Wasserstein, S. B.
Affiliations
  • Florida International University (US)
  • University of Miami (US)
ORCID
Silverman, Wendy K.
Venue
Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology
Publisher
American Psychological Association (APA)
Published
1998
Volume
66
Issue
6
Pages
883-892
ISSN
  • 0022-006X (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-2117
DOI
10.1037/0022-006x.66.6.883
OpenAlex
W1990138849
Cited by
307
References
33
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 18 · 2014: 18 · 2013: 14 · 2012: 18
FWCI
3.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child Abuse and Trauma
Keywords
post-traumatic stress, Hurricane Andrew, children, disaster exposure, anxiety, academic skills, inattention, conduct problems, African American children, risk identification, large-scale disasters
MeSH terms
Adjustment Disorders, Black or African American, Child, Child Behavior, Demography, Disasters, Female, Florida, Follow-Up Studies, Hispanic or Latino, Humans, Life Change Events, Male, Predictive Value of Tests, Prospective Studies, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Regression Analysis, Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic, Stress, Psychological, White People

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review