Cited by 800Cancer survivorship and careOptimism, Hope, and Well-beingWomen's cancer prevention and management

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 55 of the 56 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Emotionally expressive coping predicts psychological and physical adjustment to breast cancer

Stanton, Annette L., Danoff-Burg, Sharon, Cameron, Christine L., Bishop, Michelle, Collins, Charlotte A., Kirk, Sarah B., Sworowski, Lisa A., Twillman, Robert·2000·Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology

Abstract

This study tested the hypothesis that coping through emotional approach, which involves actively processing and expressing emotions, enhances adjustment and health status for breast cancer patients. Patients (n = 92) completed measures within 20 weeks following medical treatment and 3 months later. Women who, at study entry, coped through expressing emotions surrounding cancer had fewer medical appointments for cancer-related morbidities, enhanced physical health and vigor, and decreased distress during the next 3 months compared with those low in emotional expression, with age, other coping strategy scores, and initial levels on dependent variables (except medical visits) controlled statistically. Expressive coping also was related to improved quality of life for those who perceived their social contexts as highly receptive. Coping through emotional processing was related to one index of greater distress over time. Analyses including dispositional hope suggested that expressive coping may serve as a successful vehicle for goal pursuit.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/0022-006x.68.5.875

Cites

55 of 55 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 56 references

Research works printed but not linked: 5

  1. Cella, 1994, F.A.C.T. manual: Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy (FACT) scales.
  2. Endler, 1990, CISS: Coping Inventory for Stressful Situations manual.
  3. McNair, 1971, EITS manual for the Profile of Mood States.
  4. 10.1037/0022-3514.51.6.1257 · DOI
  5. 10.1037/0022-3514.66.2.350 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 800

Metadata

Authors
Stanton, A. L., Danoff-Burg, S., Cameron, C. L., Bishop, M., Collins, C. A., Kirk, S. B., Sworowski, L. A., & Twillman, R.
Affiliations
University of Kansas (US)
Venue
Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology
Published
2000
Volume
68
Issue
5
Pages
875-882
ISSN
  • 0022-006X (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-2117
OpenAlex
W2169658013
Cited by
800
References
56
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 22 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 19 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 62 · 2019: 29 · 2018: 31 · 2017: 34 · 2016: 34 · 2015: 52 · 2014: 40 · 2013: 35 · 2012: 56
FWCI
7.20
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer survivorship and care
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Optimism, Hope, and Well-being
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Women's cancer prevention and management
Keywords
breast cancer, emotional approach, emotional expression, psychological adjustment, physical adaptation, quality of life, social support, distress, dispositional hope
MeSH terms
Adaptation, Psychological, Adult, Aged, Breast Neoplasms, Female, Health Status, Humans, Internal-External Control, Middle Aged, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Quality of Life, Regression Analysis, Social Support, Stress, Psychological, Expressed Emotion

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review