CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 148HIV, Drug Use, Sexual RiskSubstance Abuse Treatment and OutcomesHIV/AIDS Research and Interventions

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 45 of the 45 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Meta-analysis of HIV risk-reduction interventions within drug abuse treatment programs

Prendergast, Michael L., Urada, Darren, Podus, Deborah·2001·Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology
DOI 10.1037/0022-006x.69.3.389
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

A meta-analysis was conducted on studies using a treatment-comparison group design to evaluate HIV/AIDS risk-reduction interventions for clients enrolled in drug abuse treatment programs. Overall, the interventions studied were found to have a reliable positive (weighted) effect size (d = 0.31), and this was unlikely to be due to publication bias. Effect sizes for specific categories of outcome variables were 0.31 for knowledge, attitudes, and beliefs; 0.26 for sexual behavior; 0.62 for risk-reduction skills; and 0.04 for injection practices. A number of potential moderators were examined. Effect sizes were negatively correlated with the presence of predominantly ethnic minority samples and positively correlated with the number of intervention techniques used, the intensity of the intervention, intervention delivery at a later stage of drug treatment or within methadone treatment, and the presence of a number of specific intervention techniques.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/0022-006x.69.3.389

Cites

45 of 45 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 5

  1. 1999, No. 2, Vol. 10
  2. Des Jarlais, 1996, HIV/AIDS prevention for injecting drug users., 40
  3. Lipsey, 1992, Juvenile delinquency treatment: A meta-analytic inquiry into the variability of effects., 83
  4. 1999, National drug control strategy, 1999.
  5. 1996, The effectiveness of AIDS prevention efforts., 1

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 148

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Prendergast, M. L., Urada, D., & Podus, D.
Affiliations
University of California, Los Angeles (US)
ORCID
Urada, Darren
Venue
Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology
Publisher
American Psychological Association (APA)
Published
2001-06
Volume
69
Issue
3
Pages
389-405
ISSN
  • 0022-006X (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-2117
DOI
10.1037/0022-006x.69.3.389
OpenAlex
W2041399780
Cited by
148
References
42
Citations by year
2024: 3 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 7
FWCI
1.15
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (5r01da009151-03)
  • National Institute on Drug Abuse (R01 DA09151)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › HIV, Drug Use, Sexual Risk
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › HIV/AIDS Research and Interventions
Keywords
HIV risk reduction, HIV prevention, addiction treatment, sexual behavior, injection practices, methadone maintenance treatment, intervention moderators, publication bias
MeSH terms
Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome, Clinical Trials as Topic, Health Education, Humans, Methadone, Opioid-Related Disorders, HIV Infections, Substance Abuse, Intravenous, Outcome Assessment, Health Care

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review