The DOI matches its Crossref record; 45 of the 45 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Meta-analysis of HIV risk-reduction interventions within drug abuse treatment programs
Abstract
A meta-analysis was conducted on studies using a treatment-comparison group design to evaluate HIV/AIDS risk-reduction interventions for clients enrolled in drug abuse treatment programs. Overall, the interventions studied were found to have a reliable positive (weighted) effect size (d = 0.31), and this was unlikely to be due to publication bias. Effect sizes for specific categories of outcome variables were 0.31 for knowledge, attitudes, and beliefs; 0.26 for sexual behavior; 0.62 for risk-reduction skills; and 0.04 for injection practices. A number of potential moderators were examined. Effect sizes were negatively correlated with the presence of predominantly ethnic minority samples and positively correlated with the number of intervention techniques used, the intensity of the intervention, intervention delivery at a later stage of drug treatment or within methadone treatment, and the presence of a number of specific intervention techniques.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“The literature on sexual risk behaviour reduction through treatment for substance misuse also tends not to examine whether reducing substance misuse is, on its own, sufficient to reduce sexual risk behaviours.”
From Screening and Brief Intervention for Substance Misuse: Does It Reduce Aggression and HIV-Related Risk Behaviours? (2015) · cites this paper as Prendergast et al., 2001
Citations
Cites
Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (1983) · Cited by 79,882
Wasserman, S. S., Hedges, L. V., & Olkin, I. (1988) · Journal of Educational Statistics · doi:10.2307/1164953 · Cited by 10,377
The file drawer problem and tolerance for null results.
Rosenthal, R. (1979) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.86.3.638 · Cited by 9,068
Statistical Methods for Meta-Analysis.
Freeman, P. R., Hedges, L. V., & Olkin, I. (1986) · Biometrics · doi:10.2307/2531069 · Cited by 4,840
Meta-Analytic Procedures for Social Research
Rosenthal, R. (1991) · doi:10.4135/9781412984997 · Cited by 4,635
Meta-Analytic Procedures for Social Research.
Metcalfe, A., & Rosenthal, R. (1994) · Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series D (The Statistician) · doi:10.2307/2348600 · Cited by 4,249
The Handbook of Research Synthesis.
Howel, D., Cooper, H., & Hedges, L. V. (1995) · Biometrics · doi:10.2307/2533295 · Cited by 3,657
Lipsey, M. W., & Wilson, D. B. (1993) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/0003-066x.48.12.1181 · Cited by 2,033
A simple, general purpose display of magnitude of experimental effect.
Rosenthal, R., & Rubin, D. B. (1982) · Journal of Educational Psychology · doi:10.1037//0022-0663.74.2.166 · Cited by 1,233
Writing meta-analytic reviews.
Rosenthal, R. (1995) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.118.2.183 · Cited by 1,108
Research works printed but not linked: 5
- 1999, No. 2, Vol. 10
- Des Jarlais, 1996, HIV/AIDS prevention for injecting drug users., 40
- Lipsey, 1992, Juvenile delinquency treatment: A meta-analytic inquiry into the variability of effects., 83
- 1999, National drug control strategy, 1999.
- 1996, The effectiveness of AIDS prevention efforts., 1
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Albarracín, D., Gillette, J. C., Earl, A. N., Glasman, L. R., Durantini, M. R., & Ho, M.-H. (2005) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.131.6.856 · Cited by 792
Individual-level interventions to reduce college student drinking: A meta-analytic review
Carey, K. B., Scott-Sheldon, L. A. J., Carey, M. P., & DeMartini, K. S. (2007) · Addictive Behaviors · doi:10.1016/j.addbeh.2007.05.004 · Cited by 699
Connock, M., Juarez-Garcia, A., Jowett, S., Frew, E., Liu, Z., Taylor, R., Fry-Smith, A., Day, E., Lintzeris, N., Roberts, T. E., et al. (2007) · Health Technology Assessment · doi:10.3310/hta11090 · Cited by 610
Logan, T., Cole, J., & Leukefeld, C. G. (2002) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.128.6.851 · Cited by 318
Ritter, A. J., & Cameron, J. (2006) · Drug and Alcohol Review · doi:10.1080/09595230600944529 · Cited by 301
Metadata
- Authors
- Prendergast, M. L., Urada, D., & Podus, D.
- Affiliations
- University of California, Los Angeles (US)
- ORCID
- Urada, Darren
- Venue
- Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology
- Published
- 2001-06
- Volume
- 69
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 389-405
- ISSN
- 0022-006X (ISSN-L)
- 1939-2117
- OpenAlex
- W2041399780
- Cited by
- 148
- References
- 42
- Citations by year
- 2024: 3 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 7
- FWCI
- 1.15
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institutes of Health (5r01da009151-03)
- National Institute on Drug Abuse (R01 DA09151)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › HIV, Drug Use, Sexual Risk
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › HIV/AIDS Research and Interventions
- Keywords
- HIV risk reduction, HIV prevention, addiction treatment, sexual behavior, injection practices, methadone maintenance treatment, intervention moderators, publication bias
- MeSH terms
- Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome, Clinical Trials as Topic, Health Education, Humans, Methadone, Opioid-Related Disorders, HIV Infections, Substance Abuse, Intravenous, Outcome Assessment, Health Care
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
