Cited by 210Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitationPsychosomatic Disorders and Their TreatmentsMedicine, History, and Philosophy

Recent advances and future directions in the biopsychosocial assessment and treatment of arthritis

Keefe, Francis J., Smith, Suzanne J., Buffington, Angela L. H., Gibson, Jessica, Studts, Jamie L., Caldwell, David S.·2002·Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology

Abstract

This article provides an overview of the emerging literature on biopsychosocial assessment and treatment for two of the most common forms of arthritis: osteoarthritis and rheumatoid arthritis. The article is divided into 3 parts. In the 1st part, the basic elements of the biopsychosocial approach to assessing and treating persons having arthritis is described. In the 2nd part, the authors evaluate studies of biopsychosocial approaches to the assessment of arthritis pain and disability. Six research areas are reviewed: learned helplessness, depression, stress, pain coping, self-efficacy, and the social context of arthritis. The 3rd part of the article reviews studies that testing the efficacy of biopsychosocial treatment approaches for persons having osteoarthritis and rheumatoid arthritis.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/0022-006x.70.3.640

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Helplessness is a concept that is increasingly being used to understand adjustment to painful rheumatic diseases.

    “Helplessness is a concept that is increasingly being used to understand adjustment to painful rheumatic diseases.51”
  • During the past 20 years, numerous studies have demonstrated that behavioral and psychosocial protocols can benefit patients with persistent pain.

    “During the past 20 years, numerous studies have demonstrated that behavioral and psychosocial protocols can benefit patients with persistent pain.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Keefe, F. J., Smith, S. J., Buffington, A. L. H., Gibson, J., Studts, J. L., & Caldwell, D. S.
Affiliations
  • Duke University (US)
  • Ohio University (US)
  • University of Louisville (US)
  • Duke Medical Center (US)
Venue
Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology
Published
2002-06
Volume
70
Issue
3
Pages
640-655
ISSN
  • 0022-006X (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-2117
OpenAlex
W2127222844
Cited by
210
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 13 · 2012: 14
FWCI
6.05
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institute of Mental Health (MH63429-01, R01MH063429)
  • National Cancer Institute (CA85219)
  • National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases (AR66064, AR46305, R01AR046305)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Medicine, History, and Philosophy
Keywords
biopsychosocial model, arthritis, osteoarthritis, rheumatoid arthritis, pain assessment, disability assessment, learned helplessness, depression, stress, pain coping, self-efficacy, social context of illness, biopsychosocial treatment, treatment efficacy
MeSH terms
Adaptation, Psychological, Arthritis, Arthritis, Rheumatoid, Disability Evaluation, Humans, Osteoarthritis, Pain, Social Support, Stress, Psychological, Self Efficacy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review