Cited by 738Diabetes Management and EducationChronic Disease Management StrategiesMusculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation

A Review and Synthesis of Research Evidence for Self-Efficacy-Enhancing Interventions for Reducing Chronic Disability: Implications for Health Education Practice (Part I)

Marks, Ray, Allegrante, John P., Lorig, Kate·2005·Health Promotion Practice

Abstract

Chronic diseases such as arthritis, diabetes, and heart disease that cause pain, functional impairment, social and emotional dysfunction, and premature loss of wage earnings constitute a challenging problem for American society. In the absence of any effective cure for these frequently progressive conditions, the secondary prevention of complications, which requires a high degree of communication and cooperation between patient and clinician, and improving quality of life and functional capacity through better disease self-management becomes critical and are key objectives of Healthy People 2010. Part I of this two-part article described the common clinical features of chronic disease, the diverse disease management strategies used for alleviating pain and preventing disability, and the role of self-efficacy as a framework for intervention. This companion article identifies and synthesizes the key research evidence for educational interventions designed to enhance individual self-efficacy perceptions and presents implications for improving practices in patient education for chronic diseases.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/1524839904266790

Cites

132 of 132 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Marks, R., Allegrante, J. P., & Lorig, K.
Affiliations
  • Columbia University (US)
  • Stanford Medicine (US)
Venue
Health Promotion Practice
Published
2005-01
Volume
6
Issue
1
Pages
37-43
ISSN
  • 1524-8399 (ISSN-L)
  • 1552-6372
OpenAlex
W2165587025
Cited by
738
References
132
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 28 · 2021: 26 · 2020: 75 · 2019: 34 · 2018: 33 · 2017: 43 · 2016: 46 · 2015: 63 · 2014: 60 · 2013: 53 · 2012: 53
FWCI
7.12
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Health Promotion Practice (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Education
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Chronic Disease Management Strategies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
Keywords
self-efficacy, chronic disease, disability prevention, disease self-management, patient education, health education intervention, chronic pain, functional capacity, secondary prevention, patient-clinician communication, arthritis, diabetes mellitus, heart disease
MeSH terms
Chronic Disease, Persons with Disabilities, Humans, Pain, Patient Education as Topic, Quality of Life, Self Care, Self Efficacy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review