The DOI matches its Crossref record; 7 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Gender, victimization, and outcomes: Reconceptualizing risk.
Abstract
Large-scale studies of gender differences in psychopathological reactions to victimization have focused on posttraumatic stress disorder, overlooking other trauma-related disorders. The present study expands this literature with a contextualized examination of interpersonal aggression exposure and sequelae. Using k-means cluster analysis on a sample of 16,000, the authors identified 8 distinct profiles of exposure to sexual violence, physical assault, stalking, and emotional abuse. Analyses of covariance then suggested links among victimization profile, gender, and mental and physical health. Results revealed no meaningful interactive effects of gender and interpersonal aggression on outcomes, once lifetime exposure to aggressive events was adequately taken into account. These findings argue against theories of female victims' greater vulnerability to pathological outcomes, instead linking risk to exposure history.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Posttraumatic Stress Disorder in the National Comorbidity Survey
Kessler, R. C. (1995) · Archives of General Psychiatry · doi:10.1001/archpsyc.1995.03950240066012 · Cited by 10,379
Meta-analysis of risk factors for posttraumatic stress disorder in trauma-exposed adults
Brewin, C. R., Andrews, B., & Valentine, J. D. (2000) · Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-006x.68.5.748 · Cited by 5,243
Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences
(1977) · doi:10.1016/c2013-0-10517-x · Cited by 2,457
Resnick, H. S., Kilpatrick, D. G., Dansky, B. S., Saunders, B. E., & Best, C. L. (1993) · Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-006x.61.6.984 · Cited by 1,868
Stress and alcohol use: Moderating effects of gender, coping, and alcohol expectancies.
Cooper, M. L., Russell, M., Skinner, J. B., Frone, M. R., & Mudar, P. (1992) · Journal of Abnormal Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-843x.101.1.139 · Cited by 817
Weiss, E. L., Longhurst, J. G., & Mazure, C. M. (1999) · American Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1176/ajp.156.6.816 · Cited by 517
Psychological aggression predicts physical aggression in early marriage.
Murphy, C. M., & O'Leary, K. D. (1989) · Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-006x.57.5.579 · Cited by 474
Cited by
Tolin, D. F., & Foa, E. B. (2006) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.132.6.959 · Cited by 2,197
An ecological model of the impact of sexual assault on women's mental health
Campbell, R., Dworkin, E., & Cabral, G. (2009) · Trauma, Violence, & Abuse · doi:10.1177/1524838009334456 · Cited by 997
Johnson, H., & Thompson, A. (2008) · Clinical Psychology Review · doi:10.1016/j.cpr.2007.01.017 · Cited by 530
Stewart, A. J., & McDermott, C. (2004) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.55.090902.141537 · Cited by 450
The gender paradigm in domestic violence research and theory: Part 1—The conflict of theory and data
Dutton, D. G., & Nicholls, T. L. (2005) · Aggression and Violent Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.avb.2005.02.001 · Cited by 384
Metadata
- Authors
- Pimlott-Kubiak, S., & Cortina, L. M.
- Venue
- Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology
- Published
- 2003-06
- Volume
- 71
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 528-539
- ISSN
- 0022-006X (ISSN-L)
- 1939-2117
- OpenAlex
- W2152885253
- Cited by
- 218
- References
- 7
- FWCI
- 7.50
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Gender, victimization, and outcomes: Reconceptualizing risk. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1037/0022-006x.71.3.528
- The paper
- Pimlott-Kubiak, S., & Cortina, L. M. (2003). Gender, victimization, and outcomes: Reconceptualizing risk. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-006x.71.3.528
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
