Cited by 530Posttraumatic Stress Disorder ResearchMigration, Health and TraumaChild Abuse and Trauma

The development and maintenance of post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) in civilian adult survivors of war trauma and torture: A review

Johnson, Howard, Thompson, Andrew·2008·Clinical Psychology Review

Abstract

This review provides a comprehensive and critical summary of the literature as to the development and maintenance of post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) following civilian war trauma and torture. Prevalence rates are reviewed and predictors are discussed in terms of risk factors, protective factors, and factors that maintain PTSD. Most epidemiologically sound studies found relatively low rates of PTSD. There is good evidence of a dose-response relationship between cumulative war trauma and torture and development and maintenance of PTSD. There is also some evidence that female gender and older age are risk factors in development of PTSD. Some refugee variables may exacerbate symptoms of PTSD and contribute to their maintenance. Preparedness for torture, social and family support, and religious beliefs may all be protective against PTSD following war trauma and torture. Applicability of the concept of PTSD to non-western populations and areas for much needed further study are discussed.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.cpr.2007.01.017

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Johnson, H., & Thompson, A.
Affiliations
University of Sheffield (GB)
Corresponding author
Johnson, Howard
Venue
Clinical Psychology Review
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2008-01
Volume
28
Issue
1
Pages
36-47
ISSN
0272-7358 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2047054062
Cited by
530
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 41 · 2023: 32 · 2022: 25 · 2021: 32 · 2020: 41 · 2019: 22 · 2018: 31 · 2017: 30 · 2016: 50 · 2015: 43 · 2014: 24 · 2013: 27 · 2012: 25
FWCI
3.46
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Clinical Psychology Review (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • ORCA Online Research @Cardiff (Cardiff University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Migration, Health and Trauma
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child Abuse and Trauma
Keywords
post-traumatic stress disorder, war trauma, torture, PTSD risk factors, protective factors, cumulative trauma, PTSD prevalence, refugee mental health, social support, religious beliefs, gender differences, age as risk factor, non-Western populations
MeSH terms
Adult, Age Factors, Aged, Cross-Cultural Comparison, Female, Humans, Life Change Events, Male, Models, Psychological, Refugees, Risk Factors, Sex Factors, Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic, Torture, Veterans, Warfare, Prevalence, Survivors

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review