CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 126Meta-analysis and systematic reviewsPsychotherapy Techniques and ApplicationsPsychology Research and Bibliometrics

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 303 of the 303 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Using Dissertations to Examine Potential Bias in Child and Adolescent Clinical Trials.

McLeod, Bryce D., Weisz, John R.·2004·Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology
DOI 10.1037/0022-006x.72.2.235
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

The major youth psychotherapy meta-analyses have relied on published studies, which may have led to biased effect size estimates. To examine this possibility, the authors compared 121 dissertations with 134 published studies and found the following: (a) few differences on individual methodological variables, but, overall, stronger methodology in dissertations; (b) no differences in the steps taken to ensure treatment integrity; and (c) a mean dissertation effect size less than half that of published studies. The effect size difference remained robust across tests controlling for all reliable method differences. The findings suggest that dissertations are so strong, both methodologically and clinically, that they warrant inclusion in child psychotherapy meta-analyses and that previous meta-analyses, by excluding them, may have overestimated treatment effects.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/0022-006x.72.2.235

Cites

303 of 303 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Items 201–303 of 303

Research works printed but not linked: 8

  1. 10.1037/0022-006X.54.2.208 · DOI
  2. Begg, 1994, Publication bias., 399
  3. 10.2307/1162512 · DOI
  4. Cohen, 1988, Statistical power analyses for the behavioral sciences
  5. 10.1037/0022-006X.50.5.672 · DOI
  6. Klarreich, 1981, A study comparing two treatment approaches with adolescent probationers., Corrective and Social Psychiatry and Journal of Behavior Technology Methods and Therapy, 27, 1
  7. 10.1037/0022-006X.67.6.995 · DOI
  8. Trapani, 1989, Effects of social skills training and cross-age tutoring on academic achievement and social behaviors of boys with learning disabilities., Journal of Research and Development in Education, 22, 1

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 126

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
McLeod, B. D., & Weisz, J. R.
Affiliations
University of California, Los Angeles (US)
ORCID
Venue
Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology
Publisher
American Psychological Association (APA)
Published
2004
Volume
72
Issue
2
Pages
235-251
ISSN
  • 0022-006X (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-2117
DOI
10.1037/0022-006x.72.2.235
OpenAlex
W2113339390
Cited by
125
References
291
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 14 · 2012: 4
FWCI
1.27
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (5k05mh001161-05, 5r01mh049522-06)
  • National Institute of Mental Health (R01 MH 49522, F31MH064993, K05-MH01161, F31-MH64993-01)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty › Meta-analysis and systematic reviews
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Psychology Research and Bibliometrics
Keywords
dissertations, child psychotherapy, adolescent psychotherapy, clinical trials, publication bias, effect size overestimation, meta-analysis, implementation fidelity, methodological quality, unpublished research
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Child, Clinical Trials as Topic, Academic Dissertations as Topic, Humans, Bias

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review