CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 239Child Welfare and AdoptionCrime Patterns and InterventionsPsychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 26 of the 26 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Multidimensional treatment foster care for girls in the juvenile justice system: 2-year follow-up of a randomized clinical trial.

Open access
Chamberlain, Patricia, Leve, Leslie D., DeGarmo, David S.·2007·Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology
DOI 10.1037/0022-006x.75.1.187PMC PMC1995088
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

This study is a 2-year follow-up of girls with serious and chronic delinquency who were enrolled in a randomized clinical trial conducted from 1997 to 2002 comparing multidimensional treatment foster care (MTFC) and group care (N = 81). Girls were referred by juvenile court judges and had an average of over 11 criminal referrals when they entered the study. A latent variable analysis of covariance model controlling for initial status demonstrated maintenance of effects for MTFC in preventing delinquency at the 2-year assessment, as measured by days in locked settings, number of criminal referrals, and self-reported delinquency. A latent variable growth model focusing on variance in individual trajectories across the course of the study also demonstrated the efficacy of MTFC. Older girls exhibited less delinquency over time relative to younger girls in both conditions. Implications for gender-sensitive programming for youths referred from juvenile justice are discussed.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/0022-006x.75.1.187

Cites

26 of 26 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 26 references

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the social sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 201–239 of 239

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Chamberlain, P., Leve, L. D., & DeGarmo, D. S.
Affiliations
Oregon Social Learning Center (US)
ORCID
Venue
Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology
Publisher
American Psychological Association (APA)
Published
2007
Volume
75
Issue
1
Pages
187-193
ISSN
  • 0022-006X (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-2117
DOI
10.1037/0022-006x.75.1.187
PMC
PMC1995088
OpenAlex
W2032780463
Cited by
238
References
26
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 16 · 2015: 21 · 2014: 22 · 2013: 28 · 2012: 21
FWCI
40.18
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • Oregon Youth Authority
  • National Institute on Drug and Alcohol Abuse (DA15208; DA17592)
  • National Institute of Mental Health (MH54257)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Child Welfare and Adoption
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Crime Patterns and Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending
Keywords
Multidimensional Treatment Foster Care, juvenile delinquency, girls, juvenile justice, group care, juvenile delinquency prevention, long-term follow-up, age differences, latent growth curve models
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Foster Home Care, Humans, Juvenile Delinquency, Oregon, Surveys and Questionnaires, Referral and Consultation, Residential Treatment

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review