CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 475Workaholism, burnout, and well-beingWork-Family Balance ChallengesPerfectionism, Procrastination, Anxiety Studies

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 27 of the 32 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The relationship of workaholism with work–life conflict, life satisfaction, and purpose in life.

Bonebright, Cynthia A., Clay, Daniel L., Ankenmann, Robert D.·2000·Journal of Counseling Psychology
DOI 10.1037/0022-0167.47.4.469
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

This study examined the differences between 2 types of workaholics (enthusiastic and nonenthusiastic workaholics) and nonworkaholic workers (work enthusiasts, relaxed workers, unengaged workers, and disenchanted workers) with respect to work-life conflict, life satisfaction, and purpose in life in a sample of 171 salaried employees of a high technology organization. Results differed for the 2 types of workaholics, supporting the importance of continued differentiation of workaholic types. Nonenthusiastic workaholics were found to have significantly more work-life conflict and significantly less life satisfaction and purpose in life than 3 of the 4 types of nonworkaholics. Enthusiastic workaholics were found to have significantly more life satisfaction and purpose in life than nonenthusiastic workaholics and significantly more work-life conflict than 3 of the 4 nonworkaholics. Implications for career planning and counseling are discussed.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/0022-0167.47.4.469

Cites

27 of 27 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 32 references

Research works printed but not linked: 8

  1. Brown, 1996, Brown's values-based, holistic model of career and life-role choices and satisfaction., 337
  2. Crumbaugh, 1981, Manual of instructions for the Purpose in Life Test.
  3. Ellis, 1995, Jumping off the fast track., Working Woman, 42
  4. Kiechel, 1989, The workaholic generation., Fortune, 119, 50
  5. Killinger, 1991, Workaholics: The respec table addicts.
  6. Maslach, 1997, The truth about burnout.
  7. Oates, 1971, Confessions of a workaholic.
  8. 10.1023/A:1016986307298 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 401–473 of 473

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Bonebright, C. A., Clay, D. L., & Ankenmann, R. D.
Affiliations
University of Iowa (US)
Venue
Journal of Counseling Psychology
Publisher
American Psychological Association (APA)
Published
2000-10
Volume
47
Issue
4
Pages
469-477
ISSN
  • 0022-0167 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-2168
DOI
10.1037/0022-0167.47.4.469
OpenAlex
W2014106788
Cited by
475
References
32
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 27 · 2024: 18 · 2023: 30 · 2022: 39 · 2021: 25 · 2020: 34 · 2019: 32 · 2018: 24 · 2017: 19 · 2016: 18 · 2015: 19 · 2014: 29 · 2013: 39 · 2012: 24
FWCI
1.74
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Counseling Psychology (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Workaholism, burnout, and well-being
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Work-Family Balance Challenges
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Perfectionism, Procrastination, Anxiety Studies
Keywords
workaholism, work-life conflict, life satisfaction, meaning of life, work engagement, disengagement, career planning, career guidance

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review