Cited by 106Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesMindfulness and Compassion InterventionsPsychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction

Commitment to a purpose in life: An antidote to the suffering by individuals with social anxiety disorder.

Open access
Kashdan, Todd B., McKnight, Patrick E.·2013·Emotion

Abstract

Recent acceptance- and mindfulness-based cognitive-behavioral interventions explicitly target the clarification and commitment to a purpose in life. Yet, scant empirical evidence exists on the value of purpose as a mechanism relevant to psychopathology or well-being. The present research explored daily (within-person) fluctuations in purposeful pursuits and well-being in a community sample of 84 adults with (n = 41) and without (n = 43) the generalized subtype of social anxiety disorder (SAD). After completing an idiographic measure of purpose in life, participants monitored their effort and progress toward this purpose, along with their well-being each day. Across 2 weeks of daily reports, we found that healthy controls reported increased self-esteem, meaning in life, positive emotions, and decreased negative emotions. People with SAD experienced substantial boosts in well-being indicators on days characterized by significant effort or progress toward their life purpose. We found no evidence for the reverse direction (with well-being boosting the amount of effort or progress that people with SAD devote to their purpose), and effects could not be attributed to comorbid mood or anxiety disorders. Results provide evidence for how commitment to a purpose in life enriches the daily existence of people with SAD. The current study supports principles that underlie what many clinicians are already doing with clients for SAD. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2013 APA, all rights reserved).

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/a0033278

Cites

82 of 82 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

14 tests recomputed · 0 with the reported and recomputed p on opposite sides of .05

Claims the paper makes

5 of 66 cited sources checked · 0 supported · 0 flagged · accuracy not yet measured

  • Premisecitation

    The deficient approach motivation or promotion system in SAD is changeable.

    “prior research suggests that the deficient approach motivation or promotion system of people with SAD is malleable.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Alden & Taylor, 2011 source
    • cites Schmidt, Richey, Buckner, & Timpano, 2009 source
    • cites Taylor & Amir, 2012 source

      The Discussion (page not provided) says the study modified automatic approach tendencies and that this influenced others’ evaluations, supporting the claim that an approach-related tendency is malleable. But it also says the participants were undergraduates with moderate social anxiety and that generalizability to people diagnosed with SAD remains to be established. The study does not establish that the broader promotion system is changeable in people with SAD. (LLM, conf=0.88)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Premisecitation

    People with SAD can be trained to attend more to rewards and thereby navigate their social world in a more approach-oriented way.

    “people with SAD can be trained to be more attentive to rewards and in turn, approach-oriented in how they navigate their social world”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Alden & Taylor, 2011 source
    • cites Schmidt, Richey, Buckner, & Timpano, 2009 source
    • cites Taylor & Amir, 2012 source

      The Abstract reports that training participants to approach positive social cues increased their approach behavior during a laboratory interaction. It does not report training attention to rewards. The Discussion says the sample consisted of undergraduates with moderate social anxiety, not people diagnosed with SAD, and that generalizability to natural social settings remains to be established (page numbers unavailable). (LLM, conf=0.90)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Premisecitation

    Recent interventions have shown that people with SAD can be trained to shift attention away from threats and become more approach-oriented, with short-term effects on social interactions.

    “Recent interventions have shown that people with SAD can be trained to direct their attention away from threats and become more approach oriented in their attention and social behavior, with evidence that these changes extend at least in the short-term to subsequent social interactions (Alden & Taylor, 2011; Schmidt et al., 2009; Taylor & Amir, 2012).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Alden & Taylor, 2011 source
    • cites Schmidt et al., 2009 source
    • cites Taylor & Amir, 2012 source

      The Abstract and Discussion report that training increased approach behavior toward positive social cues and that participants showed more approach behavior in a subsequent laboratory social interaction. They do not report training attention away from threats. The Discussion also cautions that the undergraduate sample had elevated social anxiety symptoms, not diagnosed SAD, and that generalizability to clinical samples remains untested (page numbers unavailable). (LLM, conf=0.90)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Premisecitation

    Goal and work engagement research supports the expectation that effort and progress toward a life purpose vary day to day.

    “Research on goals and work engagement supports our expectation that effort and progress toward a purpose in life would vary from day-to-day”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Petrou, Demerouti, Peeters, Schaufeli, & Hetland, 2012

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites Xanthopoulou, Bakker, Demerouti, & Schaufeli, 2009 source

      The paper’s “Fluctuations over time” section reports within-person variation in day-level work engagement, supporting the expectation that engagement can change from day to day. It studies employees’ work engagement and performance, however, not daily effort or progress toward a purpose in life; that extension is not established by this source. The indexed passages provide no page number. (LLM, conf=0.84)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • The authors state this as an assumption: Purpose-driven action varies within persons over time.
  • Findingown data

    On days when people with SAD put substantial effort into or made progress toward their life purpose, they showed large improvements in well-being indicators.

    “People with SAD experienced substantial boosts in well-being indicators on days characterized by significant effort or progress toward their life purpose.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 26
  • May combine two claims. 23
  • The quote only partly states this claim. 1
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    People vary substantially from day to day in crafting more meaningful goals, and success in this is linked to greater task engagement.

    “people show substantial variability from day to day in their ability to craft goals to be more meaningful and when successful, these behaviors are linked to greater task engagement”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Petrou et al., 2012 source

      The Discussion reports substantial day-to-day variation in job crafting, and the Abstract and Discussion link daily seeking challenges to higher work engagement. But the paper studies crafting job demands and resources, not crafting goals to be more meaningful; it also does not establish that success at doing so increases task engagement. Page numbers are not provided for these passages. (LLM, conf=0.87)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • May combine two claims. The quote only partly states this claim.

    Findingown data

    During two weeks of daily reports, healthy controls had higher self-esteem, meaning in life, and positive emotions, and lower negative emotions.

    “Across two weeks of daily reports, we found that healthy controls reported increased self-esteem, meaning in life, positive emotions, and decreased negative emotions.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    People with SAD were at a disadvantage for working toward a purpose in life, reporting greater obstacles and failures and less intrinsic motivation than healthy controls.

    “Unfortunately, people with SAD were at a disadvantage for working toward a purpose in life. In retrospective ratings about the past month, compared to healthy controls, people with SAD reported greater obstacles and failures and endorsed less intrinsic motivation for their purpose.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Neither comorbid anxiety nor mood disorders moderated the effect of daily purpose effort on daily well-being.

    “Neither comorbid anxiety (ps from .30 to .86) nor mood (ps from .12 to .64) disorders moderated daily purpose effort on daily well-being.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingown data

    More people in the SAD group than in the healthy control group had received treatment for psychological conditions.

    “Seven people (18.4%) in the SAD group received treatment for psychological conditions, whereas there was only one person in the healthy control group, χ2(1) = 6.40, p = .01.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Neither comorbid anxiety nor mood disorders moderated the effect of daily purpose progress on daily well-being.

    “neither comorbid anxiety nor mood disorders moderated purpose progress on well-being (ps > .10).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    SAD was significantly related to retrospective purpose ratings in a multivariate GLM, while comorbid mood and secondary anxiety disorders did not add significant prediction.

    “For the omnibus test, SAD was significantly related to retrospective purpose ratings, F (7, 74) = 2.49, p = .02; mood disorders and secondary anxiety disorders failed to add significant prediction to the model (ps > .90).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Controlling for comorbid anxiety and mood disorders, the SAD × daily purpose effort interaction remained significant for positive affect and showed trends for self-esteem and meaning in life.

    “Controlling for comorbid anxiety and mood disorders, the SAD x Daily Purpose Effort interaction was statistically significant for positive affect, b = .18, t = 2.16, p = .03, and had a trend for self-esteem, b = .10, t = 1.81, p = .07, and meaning in life, b = .11, t = 1.77, p = .08.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Healthy controls scored near the top of the scales, with mean daily self-esteem and meaning in life between 10 and 12 and affect scores around 19 to 20.

    “As shown in Figure 1, the healthy control group was observed at the top-end of the 14-point scales (means for daily self-esteem and daily meaning in life were between 10 and 12 points while affect scores were in the same relatively high range of 19 to 20).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    People considering suicide, and to a lesser extent those with emotional disturbances, frequently attribute their situation to a missing life purpose.

    “people who are contemplating killing themselves and, to a lesser degree, people who experience emotional disturbances often attribute their current status to a lack of purpose in life”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Camus, 1965

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites Heisel & Flett, 2004 source
    • cites Ryff & Singer, 1996

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Acceptance and Commitment Therapy has recently provided strong support for these interventions.

    “These interventions gained strong support recently through Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT; Hayes et. al., 1999)”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Hayes et. al., 1999

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisecitation

    People who regularly act on their purpose tend to reinterpret immediate situations in light of their broader purpose.

    “people who consistently engage in purpose-driven action often reinterpret immediate situations in terms of the relevance to their larger purpose”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Baumeister, 1992

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    If merely being aware of a purpose helps, then acting on or pursuing that purpose should help even more.

    “If awareness of a purpose is beneficial then engaging in or pursuing purpose-driven action ought to provide even greater benefit.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationown data

    The study backs principles that many clinicians already apply when treating clients with SAD.

    “The current study supports principles that underlie what many clinicians are already doing with clients for SAD.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Individuals with a strong sense of purpose also report more meaning in life, self-esteem, happiness, and less stress over competing goals.

    “people who endorse a strong sense of purpose in their lives also endorse greater meaning in life, self-esteem, happiness, and less stress about competing goals”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Bonebright, Clay, & Ankenmann, 2000 source
    • cites Chamberlain & Zika, 1988 source
    • cites Ryff, 1989 source
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Interpretationreasoning

    After reflecting on her purpose, a person with a clear purpose should have less trouble choosing among competing options.

    “she also ought to have less difficulty deciding between competing options when reflecting on her purpose.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    The label positivity deficits may be inaccurate for SAD; decreased well-being and approach motivation may fit better.

    “Thus, positivity deficits might be the wrong term to describe the difficulties of people with SAD –a more appropriate term might be decreased well-being and approach motivation.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisecitation

    Scheier and colleagues' self-regulation model of purpose holds that effort and progress toward a purpose maximize well-being.

    “This self-regulation model of purpose by Scheier and colleagues suggests that it is effort and progress toward a purpose that maximizes the generation of well-being.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Scheier et al., 2006 source
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Avoidance motivation serves survival, while approach motivation serves thriving.

    “avoidance motivation is designed to facilitate surviving, whereas approach motivation is designed to facilitate thriving”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Elliot, 2006 source
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Interpretationreasoning

    After reflecting on her purpose, a person with a clear purpose should perceive daily stressors as less threatening.

    “A person with a clearly defined purpose ought to find daily stressors less threatening following reflection on her purpose”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    SAD resembles other anxiety disorders in excessive threat and punishment vigilance, but differs by deficient approach motivation.

    “SAD appears to be similar to other anxiety conditions based on the presence of excessive threat and punishment vigilance (Amir, Elias, Klumpp, & Przeworski, 2003; Mogg & Bradley, 2002) but can be distinguished by the presence of deficient approach motivation (Hirsch & Mathews, 2000; Kashdan, 2007; Rodebaugh & Heimberg, 2008).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Amir, Elias, Klumpp, & Przeworski, 2003 source
    • cites Mogg & Bradley, 2002 source
    • cites Hirsch & Mathews, 2000

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisecitation

    Well-being has been theorized to follow directly from a life devoted to purpose.

    “Well-being has been theorized to be a direct consequence of a life devoted to a purpose in life”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Damon, Menon, & Cotton Bronk, 2003 source
    • cites Peterson, Park, & Seligman, 2005 source
    • cites Ryff, 1989 source
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationcitation

    Purpose in life matters for understanding the range of positivity deficits in SAD and for possible ways to improve well-being.

    “we argue that purpose in life is relevant to understanding the breadth of positivity deficits associated with SAD (Weeks & Heimberg, 2012), and potential avenues for enhancing well-being.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Weeks & Heimberg, 2012 source
    • Rests on an assumption: There is no existing empirical research on the benefits of committing effort or making progress toward a purpose in everyday life.
    • Rests on an assumption: There is no empirical evidence on the specific value of addressing life purpose in people with SAD.
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Interpretationcitation

    Effort and progress toward a life purpose concern thriving.

    “effort and progress toward a purpose in life is about thriving.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Social anxiety is theorized to activate a prevention system focused on safety and avoiding unwanted outcomes while suppressing a promotion system focused on rewards and hopes.

    “Theorists suggest that social anxiety activates a prevention system where people pursue safety and avoid unwanted outcomes while also inhibiting a promotion system where people pursue rewards and strive toward the fulfillment of hopes and aspirations”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Scholer & Higgins, 2012 source
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Prior research indicates that people with SAD have infrequent positive affect and excessive negative affect.

    “prior work shows that positive affect is infrequent and negative affect is excessive for people with SAD”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Brown, 2007 source
    • cites Kashdan, 2007

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductown data

    Daily measures provided sufficient within-person variability for daily effort (56%), progress (54%), self-esteem (39%), meaning in life (38%), positive affect (36%), and negative affect (56%).

    “Daily measures provided sufficient within-person (relative to total) variability for daily effort toward a purpose (56%), progress toward a purpose (54%), self-esteem (39%), meaning in life (38%), and positive (36%) and negative (56%) affect.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    The four reasons for pursuing strivings scales have been shown to be psychometrically sound in prior work.

    “These scales have been previously shown to be psychometrically sound (Koestner, Lekes, Powers, & Chicoine, 2002; Sheldon & Elliot, 1998; Sheldon & Houser-Marko, 2001).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Koestner, Lekes, Powers, & Chicoine, 2002 source
    • cites Sheldon & Elliot, 1998 source
    • cites Sheldon & Houser-Marko, 2001 source
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Study design and conductcitation

    Daily meaning in life was measured with a 2-item scale used in prior daily diary studies.

    “Daily meaning in life was measured with a 2-item scale (“How meaningful did you feel your life was today?” “How much did you feel your life had purpose today?”) used in prior daily diary studies (Kashdan & Steger, 2007; Michael F. Steger, Kashdan, & Oishi, 2008).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Kashdan & Steger, 2007 source
    • cites Michael F. Steger, Kashdan, & Oishi, 2008 source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductown data

    Participants completed daily entries for an average of 12.23 days (SD = 3.79).

    “Participants completed entries for an average of 12.23 days (SD = 3.79).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductown data

    There was no significant difference between SAD and control groups in number of daily entries completed (p = .83).

    “We found no significant difference between the SAD (X = 11.98 days, SD = 4.19) and control (X = 12.48 days, SD = 3.37) groups in number of entries completed (p = .83).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).

    Interpretationown data

    The findings suggest promise in moving beyond the negative spectrum of distress, avoidance, and impairment toward the positive spectrum of human functioning.

    “Our findings – among others – provide a glimpse at the promise of moving beyond the negative spectrum of distress, avoidance, and impairment toward the positive spectrum of human functioning.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    The analytic approach of recentering to calculate simple effects is widely used and has been applied to multilevel modeling.

    “This analytic approach is widely used (Cohen, Cohen, West, & Aiken, 2003) and has been previously applied to multilevel modeling (Nezlek, 2011).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Cohen, Cohen, West, & Aiken, 2003

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites Nezlek, 2011 source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductown data

    The SAD and healthy groups did not differ in age, gender, race/ethnicity, romantic relationship status, or education.

    “Groups did not differ in age, t (77) = 0.52, p = .60, d = .12, gender, χ2(1) = 0.15, p = .70, d = .04, race/ethnicity, χ2(4) = 1.19, p = .88, d = .12, romantic relationship status, χ2(4) = 5.55, p = .26, d = .25, or education, χ2(8) = 5.38, p = .72, d = .25.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Study design and conductcitation

    Daily self-esteem was measured with two items adapted from the Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale used in prior daily diary studies.

    “We measured daily self-esteem with two items adapted from the Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale (Rosenberg, 1965) used in prior daily diary studies (Kashdan & Nezlek, 2012; Nezlek & Plesko, 2001)”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Rosenberg, 1965 source
    • cites Kashdan & Nezlek, 2012 source
    • cites Nezlek & Plesko, 2001 source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductown data

    Nine participants were excluded from analyses because they lacked daily diary data.

    “Due to an absence of daily diary data, nine participants were excluded from analyses.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductcitation

    Daily negative and positive affect were measured with high and low arousal adjectives based on prior work.

    “Daily negative affect was measured by responses to high (anxious/nervous, angry) and low (sad, sluggish) arousal adjectives; daily positive affect was measured by responses to high (enthusiastic, joyful) and low (content, relaxed) arousal adjectives (Nezlek, 2005).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Nezlek, 2005 source
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    SAD is characterized by deficient approach motivation and excessive avoidance motivation and threat vigilance.

    “SAD is defined by a lack of approach motivation, and excessive avoidance motivation and vigilance to threat (Amir et al., 2003; Hirsch & Mathews, 2000; Mogg & Bradley, 2002).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Amir et al., 2003 source
    • cites Hirsch & Mathews, 2000

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites Mogg & Bradley, 2002 source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationcitation

    The results support principles underlying clinical practice with clients.

    “These results also support a few principles that underlie what clinicians are already doing with clients (Wilson & Murrell, 2004)”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Wilson & Murrell, 2004

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductcitation

    The measure of purpose in life has been validated in prior social psychology studies, but its utility as an idiographic measure of strivings in clinical samples has rarely been explored.

    “Our measure of purpose in life has been validated in prior social psychology studies, however, few studies have explored the utility of an idiographic measure of strivings in clinical samples (Elliot & Church, 2002).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Elliot & Church, 2002 source
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    The effects for the SAD group may reflect the strong impact of focusing on a purpose, while the relative differences between SAD and healthy controls may be more related to measurement than a true difference.

    “Thus, our effects for the SAD group may reflect the strong impact of focusing individuals on a purpose but the relative differences between SAD and healthy controls may be more related to a measurement issue than a true difference between groups.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Encouraging clients to reflect on life aspirations, avoidance and control strategies, and personal values is consistent with purpose in life.

    “Encouraging clients to think about life aspirations, reflecting on avoidance and control strategies, and focusing on becoming aware of meaningful personal values and making decisions based on those values remain consistent with purpose in life (McKnight & Kashdan, 2009; Steger, 2009).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites McKnight & Kashdan, 2009 source
    • cites Steger, 2009 source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductnone given

    Asking participants about their feelings immediately after asking about meaning in life may introduce demand characteristics.

    “Finally, there is the potential demand characteristic of asking people how they feel immediately after asking them how meaningful their life felt today.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationcitation

    Purpose in life operates as a mechanism that addresses risk and resilience for multiple disorders.

    “Although the current focus was on SAD, we believe purpose in life operates as a mechanism that addresses risk and resilience for multiple disorders (Andresen, Oades, & Caputi, 2003; Hedberg, Gustafson, Alèx, & Brulin, 2010).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Andresen, Oades, & Caputi, 2003 source
    • cites Hedberg, Gustafson, Alèx, & Brulin, 2010 source
44 of 44
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    There is no existing empirical research on the benefits of committing effort or making progress toward a purpose in everyday life.

    “we were surprised to find an absence of empirical research on the advantages of committing effort or making progress toward a purpose in everyday life.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    There is no empirical evidence on the specific value of addressing life purpose in people with SAD.

    “Nonetheless, there is an absence of empirical evidence on the specific value of addressing life purpose in people with SAD.”
  • The authors state this as an assumption.

    Purpose-driven action varies within persons over time.

    “Assuming there was within-person variation in purpose-driven action”
  • The authors state this as an assumption.

    There were no prior studies examining how commitment to purpose operates in daily life or in people with a disorder.

    “we are unaware of prior studies that examined how and to what extent this process operates in daily life, nor how the process works for people with a disorder.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Effort toward a purpose in life is variable and modifiable.

    “Effort toward a purpose in life is variable and modifiable.”
  • The authors state this as an assumption.

    The current study is the first to focus on the benefits of purpose in daily life.

    “the current study is the first to focus on the benefits of purpose in daily life.”
6 of 6

Statistics that don’t add up

Each reported p-value recomputed from its test statistic and degrees of freedom.

  • Inconsistent p-value: χ2(4) = 5.55, p = .26

    Minor

    The paper reports p = .26 here; recomputing from the test statistic and its degrees of freedom gives p = .235. The check cannot tell whether the statistic or the p-value is the misprint.

    Reported p = .26 · recomputed p = .235

1 of 1

Statistics recomputed

Every reported test result, recomputed from its test statistic and degrees of freedom. A result shows as not adding up only once an independent check has confirmed it.

  • Doesn’t add upχ²(4) = 5.55reported p = .26 · recomputed p = .235

    “χ2(4) = 5.55, p = .26”

  • Consistentt(77) = 0.52reported p = .6 · recomputed p = .605

    “t (77) = 0.52, p = .60”

  • Consistentχ²(1) = 0.15reported p = .7 · recomputed p = .699

    “χ2(1) = 0.15, p = .70”

  • Consistentχ²(4) = 1.19reported p = .88 · recomputed p = .880

    “χ2(4) = 1.19, p = .88”

  • Consistentχ²(8) = 5.38reported p = .72 · recomputed p = .716

    “χ2(8) = 5.38, p = .72”

  • Consistentχ²(1) = 6.4reported p = .01 · recomputed p = .011

    “χ2(1) = 6.40, p = .01”

  • Consistentt(74) = 19.6reported p < .001 · recomputed p < .001

    “t (74) = 19.60, p < .001”

  • ConsistentF(7, 74) = 2.49reported p = .02 · recomputed p = .024

    “F (7, 74) = 2.49, p = .02”

  • ConsistentF(1, 83) = 9.4reported p = .003 · recomputed p = .003

    “F(1, 83) = 9.40, p = .003”

  • ConsistentF(1, 83) = 14.58reported p < .001 · recomputed p < .001

    “F (1, 83) = 14.58, p < .001”

  • ConsistentF(1, 83) = 4.12reported p < .05 · recomputed p = .046

    “F (1, 83) = 4.12, p < .05”

  • ConsistentF(1, 83) = 8.98reported p = .004 · recomputed p = .004

    “F (1, 83) = 8.98, p = .004”

  • ConsistentF(1, 83) = 6.67reported p = .01 · recomputed p = .012

    “F (1, 83) = 6.67, p = .01”

  • ConsistentF(1, 83) = 5.36reported p = .02 · recomputed p = .023

    “F (1, 83) = 5.36, p = .02”

14 of 14

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.

  • Sample size is given as 80 persons after exclusions but participant counts sum to 76

    Major

    The daily-life analysis says there were 80 persons, yet the participant flow described earlier ends with 38 SAD participants and 38 healthy controls, which totals 76. Those two descriptions of the analyzed sample cannot both be correct.

  • Reported test degrees of freedom exceed the initial sample

    Minor

    An F test with numerator and denominator degrees of freedom of 1 and 83 requires at least 85 observations, even before accounting for the other predictors described. The paper reports only 84 participants initially.

  • Exclusion count does not match the final sample

    Minor

    Excluding nine people from the initial 84 leaves 75, but the two reported final groups contain 38 people each, totaling 76.

3 of 3

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kashdan, T. B., & McKnight, P. E.
Affiliations
George Mason University (US)
Corresponding author
Kashdan, Todd B.
Venue
Emotion
Published
2013-12
Volume
13
Issue
6
Pages
1150-1159
ISSN
  • 1528-3542 (ISSN-L)
  • 1931-1516
OpenAlex
W2160445151
Cited by
106
References
82
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 22 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 5
FWCI
4.28
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Emotion (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institute of Mental Health (R21-MH073937)
  • Center for Consciousness and Transformation
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction
Keywords
meaning of life, social anxiety disorder, well-being, meaning in life, self-esteem, positive emotions, negative emotions, within-person variability
MeSH terms
Adaptation, Psychological, Adult, Affect, Female, Humans, Male, Phobic Disorders, Quality of Life

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-09-28.

Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-09-28.

Cited sources are checked by gpt-6-sol.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review