Cited by 136Career Development and DiversityPsychological Testing and AssessmentPsychometric Methodologies and Testing

Holland's RIASEC model as an integrative framework for individual differences.

Armstrong, Patrick Ian, Day, Susan X., McVay, Jason P., Rounds, James·2008·Journal of Counseling Psychology

Abstract

Using data from published sources, the authors investigated J. L. Holland’s (1959, 1997) theory of interest types as an integrative framework for organizing individual differences variables that are used in counseling psychology. Holland’s interest types were used to specify 2- and 3-dimensional interest structures. In Study 1, measures of individual characteristics and, in Study 2, measures of environmental demands were successfully integrated into a 2-dimensional circumplex interest structure using the technique of property vector fitting. In Study 3, cognitive abilities were successfully integrated into a 3-dimensional interest structure. Obtained results illustrate the potential utility of interest-based structures for integrating a wide range of information. This represents a 1st step toward the development of an Atlas of Individual Differences, mapping the interrelations among individual-differences measures to facilitate their integrative use in career counseling and other applied settings.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/0022-0167.55.1.1

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Vocational interests are integrated in a nomological network with other individual differences.

    “Vocational interests are integrated in a nomological network with other individual differences (Armstrong et al., 2008).”

    From The German O*NET Interest Profiler Short Form (2023) · cites this paper as Armstrong et al., 2008

  • The CABIN-NET consists of 47 original CABIN items, 8 CABIN items with slight wording changes, and 5 non-CABIN items.

    “After the item reduction process, the CABIN-NET consisted of 47 original CABIN items, 8 CABIN items with slight wording changes, and 5 non-CABIN items that were either adapted from an existing RIASEC inventory (Armstrong et al., 2008) or written by the authors.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Armstrong, P. I., Day, S. X., McVay, J. P., & Rounds, J.
Venue
Journal of Counseling Psychology
Published
2008-01
Volume
55
Issue
1
Pages
1-18
ISSN
  • 0022-0167 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-2168
OpenAlex
W2148273474
Cited by
136
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 4
FWCI
24.39
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Counseling Psychology (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Career Development and Diversity
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Psychological Testing and Assessment
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
Keywords
Holland's RIASEC model, individual differences, integrative framework, cognitive ability, environmental demands, career guidance

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review