Holland's RIASEC model as an integrative framework for individual differences.
Abstract
Using data from published sources, the authors investigated J. L. Holland’s (1959, 1997) theory of interest types as an integrative framework for organizing individual differences variables that are used in counseling psychology. Holland’s interest types were used to specify 2- and 3-dimensional interest structures. In Study 1, measures of individual characteristics and, in Study 2, measures of environmental demands were successfully integrated into a 2-dimensional circumplex interest structure using the technique of property vector fitting. In Study 3, cognitive abilities were successfully integrated into a 3-dimensional interest structure. Obtained results illustrate the potential utility of interest-based structures for integrating a wide range of information. This represents a 1st step toward the development of an Atlas of Individual Differences, mapping the interrelations among individual-differences measures to facilitate their integrative use in career counseling and other applied settings.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Vocational interests are integrated in a nomological network with other individual differences.
“Vocational interests are integrated in a nomological network with other individual differences (Armstrong et al., 2008).”
From The German O*NET Interest Profiler Short Form (2023) · cites this paper as Armstrong et al., 2008
The CABIN-NET consists of 47 original CABIN items, 8 CABIN items with slight wording changes, and 5 non-CABIN items.
“After the item reduction process, the CABIN-NET consisted of 47 original CABIN items, 8 CABIN items with slight wording changes, and 5 non-CABIN items that were either adapted from an existing RIASEC inventory (Armstrong et al., 2008) or written by the authors.”
From Interest Fit Beyond the RIASEC: The Comprehensive Assessment of Basic Interests—O*NET (CABIN-NET) (2026) · cites this paper as Armstrong et al., 2008
Cites
Intelligence, personality, and interests: Evidence for overlapping traits
Ackerman, P. L., & Heggestad, E. D. (1997) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.121.2.219 · Cited by 1,719 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The German O*NET Interest Profiler Short Form
Roemer, L., Lewis, P., & Rounds, J. (2023) · Psychological Test Adaptation and Development · doi:10.1027/2698-1866/a000048 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
“Vocational interests are integrated in a nomological network with other individual differences (Armstrong et al., 2008).”
BackgroundSelf-citationInterest Fit Beyond the RIASEC: The Comprehensive Assessment of Basic Interests—O*NET (CABIN-NET)
Chu, C., Hoff, K. A., Liu, Z., Heimpel, N. F., Greco, A., Oswald, F. L., & Rounds, J. (2026) · Journal of Career Assessment · doi:10.1177/10690727251322520 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
“After the item reduction process, the CABIN-NET consisted of 47 original CABIN items, 8 CABIN items with slight wording changes, and 5 non-CABIN items that were either adapted from an existing RIASEC inventory (Armstrong et al., 2008) or written by the authors.”
Self-citation
- Authors
- Armstrong, P. I., Day, S. X., McVay, J. P., & Rounds, J.
- Venue
- Journal of Counseling Psychology
- Published
- 2008-01
- Volume
- 55
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 1-18
- ISSN
- 0022-0167 (ISSN-L)
- 1939-2168
- OpenAlex
- W2148273474
- Cited by
- 136
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 8 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 4
- FWCI
- 24.39
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Counseling Psychology (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Safety Research › Career Development and Diversity
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Psychological Testing and Assessment
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
- Keywords
- Holland's RIASEC model, individual differences, integrative framework, cognitive ability, environmental demands, career guidance
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review