The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The "testing" phenomenon: Not gone but nearly forgotten.
Abstract
The "testing " phenomenon refers to the finding that students who take a test on material between the time they first study and the time they take a final test remember more of the material than students who do not take an intervening test. 4 experiments examined the testing phenomenon in student's memory for brief passages and labels for parts of flowers. Experiments la and lb demonstrated the generality of the phenomenon to the methods and materials used in the current study. Experiment 2 ruled out an "amount of processing " hypothesis as a way of accounting for the testing phenomenon. The results of Experiment 3 seemed to indicate that the testing phenomenon resided in the number of complete retrieval events. Experiments 4a, 4b, and 4c focused on the completeness of retrieval events and indicated that the influence of retrieval on later memory performance was determined, at least in part, by the completeness of the initial retrieval event. Although there are numerous reasons for testing students' learning, one important factor is that tests improve students' memory for content (Modigliani & Hedges, 1987). In typical laboratory studies examining the so-called testing phenomenon,
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“In Glover's (1989) study, final recall was greater when an initial test had occurred.Both college students remembering an essay and seventh-grade students learning parts of a flower benefited from having taken a test (without feedback) 4 days before the final test.”
From Practicing Retrieval Facilitates Learning (2021) · cites this paper as Glover 1989
Citations
Cites
Spitzer, H. F. (1939) · Journal of Educational Psychology · doi:10.1037/h0063404 · Cited by 306
When forgetting helps memory: an analysis of repetition effects
Cuddy, L. J., & Jacoby, L. L. (1982) · Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior · doi:10.1016/s0022-5371(82)90727-7 · Cited by 170
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Dunlosky, J., Rawson, K. A., Marsh, E. J., Nathan, M. J., & Willingham, D. T. (2013) · Psychological Science in the Public Interest · doi:10.1177/1529100612453266 · Cited by 3,138
Test-Enhanced Learning: Taking Memory Tests Improves Long-Term Retention
Roediger, H. L., & Karpicke, J. D. (2006) · Psychological Science · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2006.01693.x · Cited by 2,867
The power of testing memory: Basic research and implications for educational practice
Roediger, H. L., & Karpicke, J. D. (2006) · Perspectives on Psychological Science · doi:10.1111/j.1745-6916.2006.00012.x · Cited by 2,037
The critical role of retrieval practice in long-term retention
Roediger, H. L., & Butler, A. C. (2011) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2010.09.003 · Cited by 1,796
The effect of testing versus restudy on retention: A meta-analytic review of the testing effect.
Rowland, C. A. (2014) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/a0037559 · Cited by 1,066
Metadata
- Authors
- Glover, J. A.
- Affiliations
- Ball State University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Glover, John A.
- Venue
- Journal of Educational Psychology
- Published
- 1989-09
- Volume
- 81
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 392-399
- ISSN
- 0022-0663 (ISSN-L)
- 1939-2176
- OpenAlex
- W2073855993
- Cited by
- 392
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 27 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 24 · 2019: 19 · 2018: 17 · 2017: 17 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 42 · 2014: 24 · 2013: 23 · 2012: 20
- FWCI
- 0.67
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Educational Psychology (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Visual and Cognitive Learning Processes
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
- Keywords
- testing effect, retrieval practice, memory retention, student memories
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review