Cited by 430Education, Achievement, and GiftednessMotivation and Self-Concept in SportsPerfectionism, Procrastination, Anxiety Studies

Achievement goals as predictors of achievement-relevant processes prior to task engagement.

McGregor, Holly A., Elliot, Andrew J.·2002·Journal of Educational Psychology

Abstract

This research comprised 3 studies (2 prospective and 1 short-term longitudinal) designed to investigate mastery, performance-approach, and performance-avoidance goals as predictors of achievement-relevant processes prior to the undergraduate examination experience. Results from across the 3 studies were supportive of the authors ’ hypotheses and revealed a differential predictive pattern for each of the achievement goals. Mastery goals were linked to numerous positive processes (e.g., challenge appraisals, absorption during preparation), performance-approach goals were linked to a more limited set of positive processes (e.g., challenge appraisals, grade aspirations), and performance-avoidance goals were linked to numerous negative processes (e.g., threat appraisals, anticipatory test anxiety). Implications for the trichotomous achievement goal model and educators are discussed.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/0022-0663.94.2.381

Cites

10 of 10 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Performance-avoidance goals have been systematically linked to anxiety, hopelessness, shame, low ability-related self-esteem, and pretask threat appraisals, and negatively related to self-determination, perceptions of control, and feeling calm during evaluations.

    “Performanceavoidance goals, on the other hand, have been systematically linked to anxiety, hopelessness, shame (Pekrun, Elliot, & Maier, 2006), low ability-related self-esteem, and pretask threat appraisals and negatively related to self-determination, perceptions of control, and feeling calm during evaluations (Elliot & McGregor, 2001; McGregor & Elliot, 2002).”
  • Grading has been shown to provoke challenge avoidance, as have performance-avoidance goals, whereas performance-approach goals are related to challenge construal.

    “First, although grading has been shown to provoke challenge avoidance (Harter, 1978), as have performance-avoidance goals (McGregor &Elliot, 2002), performance-approach goals are related with challenge construal (Elliot & Moller, 2003).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
McGregor, H. A., & Elliot, A. J.
Affiliations
University of Rochester (US)
Venue
Journal of Educational Psychology
Published
2002-06
Volume
94
Issue
2
Pages
381-395
ISSN
  • 0022-0663 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-2176
OpenAlex
W2112867721
Cited by
430
References
10
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 24 · 2018: 15 · 2017: 26 · 2016: 21 · 2015: 25 · 2014: 21 · 2013: 30 · 2012: 30
FWCI
12.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Educational Psychology (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Education, Achievement, and Giftedness
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Motivation and Self-Concept in Sports
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Perfectionism, Procrastination, Anxiety Studies
Keywords
achievement goals, mastery goals, performance-approach goals, performance-avoidance goals, challenge appraisal, threat appraisal, exam preparation, task engagement

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review