The DOI matches its Crossref record; 66 of the 66 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Preservice teachers' responses to bullying scenarios: Comparing physical, verbal, and relational bullying.
Abstract
In the present study, 82 undergraduate students in a teacher education program responded to 6 written vignettes describing school bullying incidents. Scenarios described physical bullying, verbal bullying, and relational bullying events. Respondents rated relational bullying as the least serious of the 3 types. Participants had the least empathy for the victims of relational bullying and were least likely to intervene in relational bullying incidents. When asked to describe interventions they would use in these cases, the preservice teachers proposed the least severe actions for both perpetrators and victims of relational bullying compared with other forms of bullying. Results were compared with those of practicing teachers in a previous study. Implications for teacher education programs are discussed. Two supplemental studies, conducted to address concerns about seriousness of bullying scenarios, are also described.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Applied Multivariate Statistics for the Social Sciences
Stevens, J. P. (2012) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9780203843130 · Cited by 10,648
Bullying at school: what we know and what we can do
(1994) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.32-1080 · Cited by 4,765
Bullying Behaviors Among US Youth: Prevalence and Association With Psychosocial Adjustment
Nansel, T. R., Overpeck, M., Pilla, R. S., Ruan, W. J., Simons-Morton, B., & Scheidt, P. (2001) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.285.16.2094 · Cited by 3,798
(2000) · Cited by 2,832
Hawker, D. S. J., & Boulton, M. J. (2000) · Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry · doi:10.1111/1469-7610.00629 · Cited by 2,694
Best, J. W., & Kahn, J. V. (1970) · Cited by 2,382
Crick, N. R. (1996) · Child Development · doi:10.1111/j.1467-8624.1996.tb01859.x · Cited by 1,182
The Use of Vignettes in Survey Research
Alexander, C. S., & Becker, H. J. (1978) · Public Opinion Quarterly · doi:10.1086/268432 · Cited by 1,169
The Vignette Technique in Survey Research
Finch, J. (1987) · Sociology · doi:10.1177/0038038587021001008 · Cited by 1,126
(2014) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9781315812397 · Cited by 1,102
Cited by
Understanding the psychology of bullying: Moving toward a social-ecological diathesis–stress model.
Swearer, S. M., & Hymel, S. (2015) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/a0038929 · Cited by 666
Update on bullying at school: Science forgotten?
Stassen Berger, K. (2007) · Developmental Review · doi:10.1016/j.dr.2006.08.002 · Cited by 578
Klassen, R. M., Perry, N. E., & Frenzel, A. C. (2012) · Journal of Educational Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0026253 · Cited by 512
Consistency of gender differences in bullying in cross-cultural surveys
Smith, P. K., López-Castro, L., Robinson, S., & Görzig, A. (2019) · Aggression and Violent Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.avb.2018.04.006 · Cited by 345
Macaulay, P. J. R., Betts, L. R., Stiller, J., & Kellezi, B. (2018) · Aggression and Violent Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.avb.2018.08.004 · Cited by 89
Metadata
- Authors
- Bauman, S., & Del Rio, A.
- Venue
- Journal of Educational Psychology
- Published
- 2006-02
- Volume
- 98
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 219-231
- ISSN
- 0022-0663 (ISSN-L)
- 1939-2176
- OpenAlex
- W1992727604
- Cited by
- 472
- References
- 66
- FWCI
- 10.54
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Preservice teachers' responses to bullying scenarios: Comparing physical, verbal, and relational bullying. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1037/0022-0663.98.1.219
- The paper
- Bauman, S., & Del Rio, A. (2006). Preservice teachers' responses to bullying scenarios: Comparing physical, verbal, and relational bullying. Journal of Educational Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.98.1.219
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
