Speech perception, vocabulary, and the development of reading skills in english among Korean- and English-speaking children.
Abstract
This study examined the roles of speech perception and phonological processing in reading and spelling acquisition for native and nonnative speakers of English in the 1st grade. The performance of 50 children (23 native English speakers and 27 native Korean speakers) was examined on tasks assessing reading and spelling, phonological processing, speech perception, and receptive vocabulary at the start and end of the school year. Korean-speaking children outperformed native English speakers on each of the literacy measures at the start and end of 1st grade, despite differences in their initial phonological representations and processing skills. Furthermore, speech perception and phonological processing were important contributors to early literacy skills, independent of oral language skills, for children from both language groups.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Cites
Linguistic Interdependence and the Educational Development of Bilingual Children
Cummins, J. (1979) · Review of Educational Research · doi:10.2307/1169960 · Cited by 3,318 · see citing works
The nature of phonological processing and its causal role in the acquisition of reading skills
Wagner, R. K., & Torgesen, J. K. (1987) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.101.2.192 · Cited by 3,303 · see citing works
Swanson, H. L. (1994) · Journal of Learning Disabilities · doi:10.1177/002221949402700107 · Cited by 272 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Indeed, there is considerable evidence that poor readers perform less well on measures of VSTM (Mann & Brady, 1988; Siegel & Ryan, 1988; Swanson, 1994; Swanson, Sáez, Gerber, & Leafstedt, 2004).”
Background
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Abu-Rabia, S., & Shakkour, W. (2014) · Open Journal of Modern Linguistics · doi:10.4236/ojml.2014.41001 · Cited by 26 · see citing works
“…occur, and coincides with the findings of others supporting the transfer of phonological awareness ability from an L1 to an L2 (Abu-Rabia & Siegel, 2002, 2003; Chiappe et al., 2007; Keung & Ho, 2009; Laurent & Martinot, 2010; Saiegh-Haddad & Geva, 2008; Verhoeven, 2007; Wade-Woolley & Geva, 2000).”
BackgroundResult
- Authors
- Chiappe, P., Glaeser, B., & Ferko, D.
- Affiliations
- University of California, Irvine (US)
- California State University, Fullerton (US)
- Venue
- Journal of Educational Psychology
- Published
- 2007-02
- Volume
- 99
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 154-166
- ISSN
- 0022-0663 (ISSN-L)
- 1939-2176
- OpenAlex
- W2009731022
- Cited by
- 70
- References
- 3
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 5
- FWCI
- 10.08
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Educational Psychology (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Reading and Literacy Development
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Language Development and Disorders
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Phonetics and Phonology Research
- Keywords
- speech perception, phonological processing, reading acquisition, spelling acquisition, receptive vocabulary, early literacy, Korean-speaking children, English-speaking children, bilingual children, first grade
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review