Attributions of blame and coping in the "real world": Severe accident victims react to their lot.

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to examine the relation between victims' attributions of causality for their accidents and their ability to cope with severe misfortune. A total of 29 individuals who had been paralyzed in serious accidents were intensively interviewed. Both quantitative and open-ended questions were used to elicit attributions of blame and causality by respondents; coping scores were obtained from a social worker and a nurse familiar with each respondent's case. Findings suggested that blaming another and feeling that one could have avoided the accident were successful predictors of poor coping; self-blame was a successful predictor of good coping. The question, "Why me?" was posed by all respondents, and 28 of the 29 related specific hypotheses that they entertained to explain why the accident had happened to them. Their responses seemed to illustrate the respondents' need for meaning in explaining the selective incidence of the accident.

Cites (18)

1. Generalized expectancies for internal versus external control of reinforcement.
   Rotter, Julian B. · 1966 · Psychological Monographs: General and Applied
2. Observer's reaction to the "innocent victim": Compassion or rejection?
   Lerner, Melvin J., Simmons, Carolyn H. · 1966 · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
3. Defensive attribution: Effects of severity and relevance on the responsibility assigned for an accident.
   Shaver, Kelly G. · 1970 · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
4. Assignment of responsibility for an accident.
   Walster, Elaine · 1966 · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
5. Responses to Uncontrollable Outcomes: An Integration of Reactance Theory and the Learned Helplessness Model
   Wortman, Camille B., Brehm, Jack W. · 1975 · Advances in Experimental Social Psychology
6. Who Believes in a Just World
   Lerner, Melvin J. · 1980 · The Belief in a Just World
7. Evaluation of performance as a function of performer's reward and attractiveness.
   Lerner, Melvin J. · 1965 · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
8. STRESS, DEFENSES AND COPING BEHAVIOR: OBSERVATIONS IN PARENTS OF CHILDREN WITH MALIGNANT DISEASE
   CHODOFF, PAUL, FRIEDMAN, STANFORD B., HAMBURG, DAVID A. · 1964 · American Journal of Psychiatry
9. Victim or perpetrator?: Defensive attribution of responsibility and the need for order and justice.
   Chaikin, Alan L., Darley, John M. · 1973 · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
10. Reactions to suffering of others under conditions of indirect responsibility.
    Lerner, Melvin J., Matthews, Gail · 1967 · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology

Show all 18 references

Cited by (44)

1. Illusion and well‐being: A social psychological perspective on mental health
   Taylor, Shelley E., Brown, Jonathon D. · 1988 · Psychological Bulletin
2. Dynamics of a stressful encounter: Cognitive appraisal, coping, and encounter outcomes.
   Susan Folkman, Richard S. Lazarus, Christine Dunkel‐Schetter, Anita DeLongis, Rand J. Gruen · 1986 · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
3. Human Aging: Usual and Successful
   Rowe, John W., Kahn, Robert L. · 1987 · Science
4. Social stigma and self-esteem: The self-protective properties of stigma.
   Crocker, Jennifer, Major, Brenda · 1989 · Psychological Review
5. Making sense of the meaning literature: An integrative review of meaning making and its effects on adjustment to stressful life events
   Park, Crystal L. · 2010 · Psychological Bulletin

See all 965