Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 224

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

STRESS, DEFENSES AND COPING BEHAVIOR: OBSERVATIONS IN PARENTS OF CHILDREN WITH MALIGNANT DISEASE

CHODOFF, PAUL, FRIEDMAN, STANFORD B., HAMBURG, DAVID A.·1964·American Journal of Psychiatry

Abstract

Perhaps for too long a time, psychiatrists have drawn their conclusions about behavior from the study of "patients" or deviants. Research on reactions to stress situations attempts to redress this imbalance by paying attention also to persons who handle life's contingencies well. The present paper reports observations on the adaptional behavior of 46 parents of 27 children under treatment for leukemia or other malignant diseases, carried out over a period of approximately 2 years at the Clinical Center of the NIH. Although each parent reacted to the stresses to which he was exposed in a unique and individual manner, a fairly uniform "natural history" of the sequence of adaptational techniques employed by the group as a whole could be observed and is summarized in the paper. The psychic instrumentalities responsible for the stages in this process are conceptualized as coping strategies which are either aided by personality defenses operating within an optimum range or interfered with by defenses when these are ineffective at one extreme of this range or are symptomatically obtrusive at the other. The various defenses employed are listed and described; the most important of these were isolation of affect, denial, and motor activity, and it is suggested that these may have broad application as "normal" defenses. An important, and even urgent need of the parents was to encompass the tragic events unfolded before them within some broad framework of meaning comprehensible in terms of their experiences and beliefs. This "search for meaning," stemming from an inability to tolerate a world in which leukemia strikes a child without apparent rhyme or reason, took various forms such as seeking out some personal agency who could be blamed for the disease or placing it within the inscrutable significance of a religious scheme of things. The process of anticipatory mourning (Lindemann), the gradual detachment of emotional investment from the child, was noted in most cases in which the course of illness was longer than 3 or 4 months, and resulted in a muting of the grief reaction so that the terminal phase and death of the child was often received with an attitude of "philosophical resignation." However, there appeared to be a reciprocal relationship between this process and unusually strong denial defenses, so that in parents in whom the latter were present, the reaction to the death and to post-mortem mourning was likely to be more distressing.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1176/ajp.120.8.743

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 224

Metadata

Authors
CHODOFF, P., FRIEDMAN, S. B., & HAMBURG, D. A.
Venue
American Journal of Psychiatry
Published
1964-02
Volume
120
Issue
8
Pages
743-749
ISSN
  • 0002-953X (ISSN-L)
  • 1535-7228
OpenAlex
W2016172382
Cited by
224
References
1
FWCI
62.97
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: STRESS, DEFENSES AND COPING BEHAVIOR: OBSERVATIONS IN PARENTS OF CHILDREN WITH MALIGNANT DISEASE. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1176/ajp.120.8.743
The paper
CHODOFF, P., FRIEDMAN, S. B., & HAMBURG, D. A. (1964). STRESS, DEFENSES AND COPING BEHAVIOR: OBSERVATIONS IN PARENTS OF CHILDREN WITH MALIGNANT DISEASE. American Journal of Psychiatry. https://doi.org/10.1176/ajp.120.8.743

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.