Cited by 72Education, Achievement, and GiftednessPersonality Traits and PsychologyPsychological Testing and Assessment

Explaining attributions for achievement: A path analytic approach

Bernstein, William M., Stephan, Walter G., Davis, Mark H.·1979·Journal of Personality and Social Psychology

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/0022-3514.37.10.1810

Cites

16 of 16 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bernstein, W. M., Stephan, W. G., & Davis, M. H.
Affiliations
The University of Texas at Austin (US)
Venue
Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
Published
1979-10
Volume
37
Issue
10
Pages
1810-1821
ISSN
  • 0022-3514 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-1315
OpenAlex
W1984269445
Cited by
72
References
16
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2017: 3 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 1
FWCI
4.93
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Personality and Social Psychology (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Education, Achievement, and Giftedness
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Traits and Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Psychological Testing and Assessment
Keywords
achievement motivation, attribution theory, success and failure, path analysis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review