The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Theory and measurement of androgyny: A reply to the Pedhazur-Tetenbaum and Locksley-Colten critiques.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“The short form of the BSRI (Bem, 1979) was devised based on factor analyses of the original measure and contains only those items with the highest loadings on the masculinity and femininity factors (plus 10 filler items).”
From Sex differences in emotion: Expression, experience, and physiology. (1998) · cites this paper as Bem, 1979
Citations
Cites
Availability: A heuristic for judging frequency and probability
Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1973) · Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.1016/0010-0285(73)90033-9 · Cited by 9,984
REMEMBERING: A STUDY IN EXPERIMENTAL AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY
Bartlett, F. C., & Burt, C. (1933) · British Journal of Educational Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.2044-8279.1933.tb02913.x · Cited by 7,475
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Sex differences in emotion: Expression, experience, and physiology.
Kring, A. M., & Gordon, A. H. (1998) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.74.3.686 · Cited by 1,067
Thirty Years After the Discovery of Gender: Psychological Concepts and Measures of Masculinity
Smiler, A. P. (2004) · Sex Roles · doi:10.1023/b:sers.0000011069.02279.4c · Cited by 240
Metadata
- Authors
- Bem, S. L.
- Affiliations
- Cornell University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Bem, Sandra Lipsitz
- Venue
- Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
- Published
- 1979
- Volume
- 37
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 1047-1054
- ISSN
- 0022-3514 (ISSN-L)
- 1939-1315
- OpenAlex
- W2058143703
- Cited by
- 341
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 6
- FWCI
- 60.12
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Personality and Social Psychology (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender Roles and Identity Studies
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
- Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender and Feminist Studies
- Keywords
- androgyny, gender role orientation, gender role scales, personality assessment, gender role theory
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Theory and measurement of androgyny: A reply to the Pedhazur-Tetenbaum and Locksley-Colten critiques. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1037/0022-3514.37.6.1047
- The paper
- Bem, S. L. (1979). Theory and measurement of androgyny: A reply to the Pedhazur-Tetenbaum and Locksley-Colten critiques. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.37.6.1047
