Dissonance arousal: Physiological evidence.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Attitude changes in cognitive dissonance scenarios are accompanied by galvanic skin response, a physiological marker of affective arousal.
“First, the attitude changes in these scenarios are accompanied by the galvanic skin response, a key physiological marker of affective arousal (Croyle & Cooper, 1983; Elkin & Leippe, 1986).”
From Conative Dissonance (2026) · cites this paper as Croyle & Cooper, 1983
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Toward a Biological Understanding of Mortality Salience (And Other Threat Compensation Processes)
Tritt, S. M., Inzlicht, M., & Harmon-Jones, E. (2012) · Social Cognition · doi:10.1521/soco.2012.30.6.715 · Cited by 60 · see citing works
Nanay, B. (2026) · Cognitive Science · doi:10.1111/cogs.70258
- Authors
- Croyle, R. T., & Cooper, J.
- ORCID
- Croyle, Robert T.
- Venue
- Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
- Published
- 1983
- Volume
- 45
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 782-791
- ISSN
- 0022-3514 (ISSN-L)
- 1939-1315
- OpenAlex
- W4247916866
- Cited by
- 197
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 19 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 59 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 7
- FWCI
- 10.20
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Personality and Social Psychology (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Psychology of Social Influence
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Death Anxiety and Social Exclusion
- Keywords
- cognitive dissonance, physiological arousal, autonomic nervous system, emotional arousal
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
