CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 262Stress Responses and CortisolCancer, Stress, Anesthesia, and Immune ResponseHealth, psychology, and well-being

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 60 of the 62 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Impact of perceived self-efficacy in coping with stressors on components of the immune system.

Wiedenfeld, Sue A., O'Leary, Ann, Bandura, Albert, Brown, Shirley, Levine, Seymour, Raska, Karel·1990·Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
DOI 10.1037/0022-3514.59.5.1082
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

This experiment examined the impact of experimentally varied perceived self-efficacy in exercising control over stressors on components of the immunological system. Immunological changes while coping with phobic stressors were measured within an intrasubject control design that included a baseline phase, an efficacy-acquisition phase, and a maximal-efficacy phase. In each of these phases, perceived coping self-efficacy, level of autonomic and endocrine activation, and several components of the immunological system were measured. Development of strong perceived self-efficacy to control phobic stressors had an immunoenhancing effect. A slow growth of perceived self-efficacy, heart rate acceleration, and cortisol activation attenuated immunological system status during the efficacy-acquisition phase. Rapid growth of perceived self-efficacy also predicted maintenance of immunoenhancement during the maximal perceived self-efficacy phase.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/0022-3514.59.5.1082

Cites

60 of 60 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 62 references

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 201–262 of 262

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Wiedenfeld, S. A., O'Leary, A., Bandura, A., Brown, S., Levine, S., & Raska, K.
Affiliations
Stanford University (US)
Venue
Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
Publisher
American Psychological Association (APA)
Published
1990
Volume
59
Issue
5
Pages
1082-1094
ISSN
  • 0022-3514 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-1315
DOI
10.1037/0022-3514.59.5.1082
OpenAlex
W2100613503
Cited by
262
References
62
Citations by year
2025: 3 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 5
FWCI
3.82
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Personality and Social Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (5p01hd002881-23, 5r01mh005162-25)
  • National Institute of Mental Health (MH-5162-25, MH-19936)
  • Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (HD 02881)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Behavioral Neuroscience › Stress Responses and Cortisol
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cancer Research › Cancer, Stress, Anesthesia, and Immune Response
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health, psychology, and well-being
Keywords
self-efficacy, stress coping, immune system, immune enhancement, cortisol, heart rate, autonomic activation, stress immunology
MeSH terms
Adaptation, Psychological, Adult, Arousal, Female, T-Lymphocytes, Helper-Inducer, Humans, Immune Tolerance, Internal-External Control, Leukocyte Count, Male, Middle Aged, Phobic Disorders, Self Concept, T-Lymphocytes, Regulatory

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review