CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 449Social and Intergroup PsychologyPsychometric Methodologies and TestingPsychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Stereotypes and standards of judgment.

Biernat, Monica, Manis, Melvin, Nelson, Thomas E.·1991·Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
DOI 10.1037/0022-3514.60.4.485
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

People routinely adjust their subjective judgment standards as they evaluate members of stereotyped social groups. Such shifts are less likely to occur, however, when judgments are made on stable, «objective» response scales. In 3 studies, subjects judged a series of targets with respect to a number of gender-relevant attributes (e.g., height, weight, and income), using either subjective (Likert-type) or objective response scales (e.g., inches, pounds, and dollars)

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/0022-3514.60.4.485

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The shifting standards paradigm accurately predicts disparate evaluation criteria as they are used to assess individuals based on their minority or majority status.

    “In brief, the shifting standards paradigm appears to accurately predict disparate evaluation criteria as they are utilized to assess individuals based on their minority or majority status (Biernat et al., 1991).”

    From Examining Counselor Trainees’ Clinical Impressions of Pornography Use: Implications for Couple and Family Counselors (2026) · cites this paper as Biernat et al., 1991

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Biernat, M., Manis, M., & Nelson, T. E.
Affiliations
University of Florida (US)
ORCID
Venue
Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
Publisher
American Psychological Association (APA)
Published
1991-04
Volume
60
Issue
4
Pages
485-499
ISSN
  • 0022-3514 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-1315
DOI
10.1037/0022-3514.60.4.485
OpenAlex
W2135349132
Cited by
449
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 22 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 18 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 18 · 2018: 20 · 2017: 16 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 16 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 21 · 2012: 12
FWCI
32.50
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Personality and Social Psychology (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment
Keywords
stereotypes, subjective judgment, gender stereotypes, height, weight, income

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review