Promoting systematic processing in low-motivation settings: Effect of incongruent information on processing and judgment.

Maheswaran, Durairaj, Chaiken, Shelly·1991·Journal of Personality and Social Psychology

Abstract

Ss received consensus information that was either congruent or incongruent with the valence of persuasive message content. In Experiment 1 Ss believed that their processing task was either important or unimportant whereas in Experiment 2 all Ss believed that their task was unimportant. In accord with the heuristic-systematic model's sufficiency principle, high-task-importance Ss exhibited a great deal of systematic processing regardless of congruency, whereas low-importance Ss processed systematically only when they received incongruent messages; in the congruent conditions heuristic processing dominated. Attitude data generally reflected these processing differences and confirmed the additivity and attenuation assumptions of the model. The utility of the sufficiency principle for understanding motivation for elaborative processing and the relevance of the findings to understanding the processing and judgmental effects of expectancy disconfirmation are discussed.

Cites (2)

  1. The effects of involvement on responses to argument quantity and quality: Central and peripheral routes to persuasion.
    Petty, Richard E., Cacioppo, John T. · 1984 · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
  2. Effect of schema-incongruent information on memory for stereotypical attributes.
    O'Sullivan, Chris S., Durso, Francis T. · 1984 · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology

Show all 2 references

Cited by (35)

  1. The psychology of curiosity: A review and reinterpretation.
    Loewenstein, George · 1994 · Psychological Bulletin
  2. Shaping perceptions to motivate healthy behavior: The role of message framing.
    Rothman, Alexander J., Salovey, Peter · 1997 · Psychological Bulletin
  3. Party Over Policy: The Dominating Impact of Group Influence on Political Beliefs.
    Cohen, Geoffrey L. · 2003 · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
  4. The Impact of Accountability on Judgment and Choice: Toward A Social Contingency Model
    Tetlock, Philip E. · 1992 · Advances in Experimental Social Psychology
  5. Social identity contingencies: how diversity cues signal threat or safety for African Americans in mainstream institutions
    Purdie-Vaughns, Valerie, Steele, Claude M., Davies, Paul G., Ditlmann, Ruth, Crosby, Jennifer Randall · 2008 · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology

See all 831

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Promoting systematic processing in low-motivation settings: Effect of incongruent information on processing and judgment. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1037//0022-3514.61.1.13
The paper
Maheswaran, D., & Chaiken, S. (1991). Promoting systematic processing in low-motivation settings: Effect of incongruent information on processing and judgment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.61.1.13

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.