Choice shift and group polarization: an analysis of the status of arguments and social decision schemes.
Abstract
Two Choice Dilemma Questionnaire items were used to investigate the influence of persuasive arguments and social decision schemes on group decisions. Furthermore, the predictions of the persuasive arguments theory on the polarization of individual preferences were tested. Ss were given lists of persuasive arguments and a second individual decision was requested before the group discussion. The reduced paired comparison median model showed the best fit and the highest hit rate in predicting the group decisions.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
If polled anonymously after a group discussion, individual members of deliberative groups typically tend to have more extreme positions than the mean initial view.
“If polled anonymously after a group discussion, individual members of deliberative groups will typically tend to have more extreme positions than the mean initial view (Zuber et al., 1992).”
From Collaborative Irrationality, Akrasia, and Groupthink: Social Disruptions of Emotion Regulation (2017) · cites this paper as Zuber et al., 1992
Cites
Meta-analysis in social research
(1982) · Evaluation and Program Planning · doi:10.1016/0149-7189(82)90011-8 · Cited by 3,896 · see citing works
The Theory of Committees and Elections.
Alan, S., & Black, D. (1959) · Economica · doi:10.2307/2550498 · Cited by 2,867 · see citing works
On the Rationale of Group Decision-making
Black, D. (1948) · Journal of Political Economy · doi:10.1086/256633 · Cited by 2,452 · see citing works
Interaction Process Analysis: A Method for the Study of Small Groups.
Greenwood, E. C. V., & Bales, R. F. (1950) · American Sociological Review · doi:10.2307/2086941 · Cited by 1,673 · see citing works
Mémoire sur les élections au scrutin
Daunou, P. C. F. (1803) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 814 · see citing works
Group decision and social interaction: A theory of social decision schemes.
Davis, J. H. (1973) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/h0033951 · Cited by 682 · see citing works
Risky and cautious shifts in group decisions: The influence of widely held values
Stoner, J. A. F. (1968) · Journal of Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/0022-1031(68)90069-3 · Cited by 453 · see citing works
Group influence on individual risk taking.
Wallach, M. A., Kogan, N., & Bem, D. J. (1962) · Journal of Abnormal & Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/h0044376 · Cited by 422 · see citing works
Committee Decisions under Majority Rule: An Experimental Study
Fiorina, M. P., & Plott, C. R. (1978) · American Political Science Review · doi:10.2307/1954111 · Cited by 396 · see citing works
Risk Taking: A Study in Cognition and Personality
Kogan, N., & Wallach, M. A. (1983) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 360 · see citing works
Vinokur, A. D., & Burstein, E. (1974) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/h0036010 · Cited by 248 · see citing works
Choice shifts in group discussion: An introductory review.
Pruitt, D. G. (1971) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/h0031922 · Cited by 247 · see citing works
Swingle, P. G. (1970) · Cited by 220 · see citing works
Paulus, P. B. (1983) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-1-4612-5578-9 · Cited by 183 · see citing works
Risk taking by individuals and groups: An assessment of research employing choice dilemmas.
Cartwright, D. (1971) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/h0031912 · Cited by 180 · see citing works
Why do Groups Make Riskier Decisions Than Individuals?
Dion, K. L., Baron, R. S., & Miller, N. (1970) · Advances in experimental social psychology · doi:10.1016/s0065-2601(08)60094-5 · Cited by 170 · see citing works
Group decision making and social influence: A social interaction sequence model.
Stasser, G. L., & Davis, J. H. (1981) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.88.6.523 · Cited by 152 · see citing works
Burnstein, E., & Vinokur, A. D. (1975) · Journal of Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/0022-1031(75)90045-1 · Cited by 151 · see citing works
Depolarization of attitudes in groups.
Vinokur, A. D., & Burnstein, E. (1978) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.36.8.872 · Cited by 144 · see citing works
Determinants of scientific progress: The case of research on the risky shift.
Cartwright, D. (1973) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/h0034445 · Cited by 127 · see citing works
Novel argumentation and attitude change: The case of polarization following group discussion
Vinokur, A. D., & Burnstein, E. (1978) · European Journal of Social Psychology · doi:10.1002/ejsp.2420080306 · Cited by 124 · see citing works
Burnstein, E., Vinokur, A., & Yaacov Trope, B. (1973) · Journal of Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/0022-1031(73)90012-7 · Cited by 106 · see citing works
Social combination models, persuasive arguments theory, social comparison theory, and choice shift.
Laughlin, P. R., & Earley, P. C. (1982) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.42.2.273 · Cited by 103 · see citing works
Conclusions: Toward an understanding of choice shifts in group discussion.
Pruitt, D. G. (1971) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/h0031923 · Cited by 102 · see citing works
Current issues in West German decision research
Scholz, R. W. (1986) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 84 · see citing works
An information integration analysis of attitude change in group discussion.
Anderson, N. H., & Graesser, C. C. (1976) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.34.2.210 · Cited by 80 · see citing works
Discussion Polarization Effects in a Modified Jury Decision Paradigm: Informational Influences
Kaplan, M. F. (1977) · Sociometry · doi:10.2307/3033533 · Cited by 80 · see citing works
Baron, R. S., & Roper, G. (1976) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.33.5.521 · Cited by 63 · see citing works
Persuasive Arguments Theory, Group Polarization, and Choice Shifts
Hinsz, V. B., & Davis, J. H. (1984) · Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin · doi:10.1177/0146167284102012 · Cited by 62 · see citing works
Kaplan, M. F., & Miller, C. E. (1983) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-1-4612-5578-9_4 · Cited by 60 · see citing works
The role of social comparison in choice shifts.
Goethals, G. R., & Zanna, M. P. (1979) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.37.9.1469 · Cited by 57 · see citing works
The influencing process in group decision making.
Kaplan, M. F. (1987) · Cited by 44 · see citing works
Blascovich, J., Veach, T. L., & Ginsburg, G. P. (1973) · Sociometry · doi:10.2307/2786281 · Cited by 41 · see citing works
Crott, H. W., Szilvas, K., & Zuber, J. A. (1991) · Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes · doi:10.1016/0749-5978(91)90040-z · Cited by 36 · see citing works
Self-citationDoes Learning Others' Opinions Change One's Opinions?
Myers, D. G., Bruggink, J. B., Kersting, R. C., & Schlosser, B. A. (1980) · Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin · doi:10.1177/014616728062011 · Cited by 33 · see citing works
Social transition schemes: Model, method, and applications
Kerr, N. L. (1982) · Kent Academic Repository (University of Kent) · Cited by 31 · see citing works
Social decision schemes and choice shift: An analysis of group decisions among bets
Crott, H. W., Zuber, J. A., & Schermer, T. (1986) · Journal of Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/0022-1031(86)90038-7 · Cited by 30 · see citing works
Self-citationEmergent Norms and Choice Shifts Involving Risk
Blascovich, J., & Ginsburg, G. P. (1974) · Sociometry · doi:10.2307/2786376 · Cited by 27 · see citing works
Blackjack, Choice Shifts in the Field
Blascovich, J., Ginsburg, G. P., & Howe, R. C. (1976) · Sociometry · doi:10.2307/2786521 · Cited by 17 · see citing works
Biases in Group Decision Making
Crott, H. W., & Zuber, J. A. (1983) · Advances in psychology · doi:10.1016/s0166-4115(08)62201-3 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
Self-citation
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Collaborative Irrationality, Akrasia, and Groupthink: Social Disruptions of Emotion Regulation
Szanto, T. (2017) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2016.02002 · Cited by 12 · see citing works
- Authors
- Zuber, J. A., Crott, H. W., & Werner, J.
- Affiliations
- University of Freiburg (DE)
- ORCID
- Zuber, Johannes A.
- Venue
- Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
- Published
- 1992-01
- Volume
- 62
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 50-61
- ISSN
- 0022-3514 (ISSN-L)
- 1939-1315
- OpenAlex
- W2040893340
- Cited by
- 83
- References
- 40
- Citations by year
- 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 5 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 1 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 5
- FWCI
- 3.63
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Personality and Social Psychology (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › General Decision Sciences › Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Psychology of Social Influence
- Keywords
- choice shift, group polarization, persuasive arguments, group decision making, individual preferences
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review