Cited by 83Social and Intergroup PsychologyDecision-Making and Behavioral EconomicsPsychology of Social Influence

Choice shift and group polarization: an analysis of the status of arguments and social decision schemes.

Zuber, Johannes A., Crott, Helmut W., Werner, Joachim·1992·Journal of Personality and Social Psychology

Abstract

Two Choice Dilemma Questionnaire items were used to investigate the influence of persuasive arguments and social decision schemes on group decisions. Furthermore, the predictions of the persuasive arguments theory on the polarization of individual preferences were tested. Ss were given lists of persuasive arguments and a second individual decision was requested before the group discussion. The reduced paired comparison median model showed the best fit and the highest hit rate in predicting the group decisions.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/0022-3514.62.1.50

Cites

40 of 40 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • If polled anonymously after a group discussion, individual members of deliberative groups typically tend to have more extreme positions than the mean initial view.

    “If polled anonymously after a group discussion, individual members of deliberative groups will typically tend to have more extreme positions than the mean initial view (Zuber et al., 1992).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Authors
Zuber, J. A., Crott, H. W., & Werner, J.
Affiliations
University of Freiburg (DE)
Venue
Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
Published
1992-01
Volume
62
Issue
1
Pages
50-61
ISSN
  • 0022-3514 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-1315
OpenAlex
W2040893340
Cited by
83
References
40
Citations by year
2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 5 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 1 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 5
FWCI
3.63
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Personality and Social Psychology (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › General Decision Sciences › Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Psychology of Social Influence
Keywords
choice shift, group polarization, persuasive arguments, group decision making, individual preferences

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review