Cited by 250Social and Intergroup PsychologyVisual Attention and Saliency DetectionVisual perception and processing mechanisms

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

On the orienting value of attitudes: Attitude accessibility as a determinant of an object's attraction of visual attention.

Roskos-Ewoldsen, David R., Fazio, Russell H.·1992·Journal of Personality and Social Psychology

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/0022-3514.63.2.198

Cites

0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

The publisher hasn’t deposited this paper’s reference list.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 201–249 of 249

Metadata

Authors
Roskos-Ewoldsen, D. R., & Fazio, R. H.
Venue
Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
Published
1992
Volume
63
Issue
2
Pages
198-211
ISSN
  • 0022-3514 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-1315
OpenAlex
W4323018851
Cited by
250
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 19 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 11
FWCI
18.15
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Personality and Social Psychology (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Visual Attention and Saliency Detection
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Visual perception and processing mechanisms
Keywords
attitude accessibility, visual attention, attentional capture

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review