Role of meaningful subgroups in explaining differences in perceived variability for in-groups and out-groups.

Abstract

Five aspects of the complexity of the knowledge representation of business and engineering majors were examined to see whether these differed by group membership and whether these differences were related to differences in perceived variability. Significantly more subgroups were generated when describing the in-group than the out-group; this difference predicted the relative tendency to see the in-group as more variable, and when controlled for statistically, out-group homogeneity effects were eliminated. Familiarity, redundancy, number of attributes used to describe the group, and the deviance of the subgroups from the larger group generally showed differences for in-group and out-group but did not show consistent evidence of mediation. In a 2nd study, Ss who were asked to sort group members into meaningful subgroups perceived greater variability relative to those who did not perform the sorting task.

Cites (1)

1. Cognitive processes in the revision of stereotypic beliefs.
   Weber, Reneé, Crocker, Jennifer · 1983 · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology

Show all 1 references

Cited by (12)

1. Construal-level theory of psychological distance.
   Trope, Yaacov, Liberman, Nira · 2010 · Psychological Review
2. Temporal construal.
   Trope, Yaacov, Liberman, Nira · 2003 · Psychological Review
3. Social cognition in schizophrenia.
   Penn, David L., Corrigan, Patrick W., Bentall, Richard P., Racenstein, J. Meg, Newman, Leonard · 1997 · Psychological Bulletin
4. Automatic processing of psychological distance: Evidence from a Stroop task.
   Bar-Anan, Yoav, Liberman, Nira, Trope, Yaacov, Algom, Daniel · 2007 · Journal of Experimental Psychology: General
5. Creeping dispositionism: The temporal dynamics of behavior prediction.
   Nussbaum, Shiri, Trope, Yaacov, Liberman, Nira · 2003 · Journal of Personality & Social Psychology

See all 215