Social facilitation and inhibition of emotional expression and communication.
Abstract
Does the presence of others facilitate or inhibit emotional expression? Female "senders" (n = 45) viewed 12 emotionally loaded slides either alone or with another sender while responses were secretly videotaped. In Study 1, 14 "receivers" guessed the type of slide viewed by dyads more accurately (eta = .366). In Study 2, 42 receivers viewed 10 senders with friends, 10 with strangers, and 10 alone. One dyad member was covered so that only 1 sender was visible. Analysis revealed significant effects of condition (alone, friend, or stranger; eta = .456), slide type (sexual, scenic, unpleasant, or unusual; eta = .325), and the Condition x Slide Type interaction (eta = .350). Strangers had overall inhibitory effects on communication accuracy, whereas friends had facilitative effects on some slides and inhibitory effects on others. Thus, both social facilitation and inhibition of expression occurred on the basis of the emotional stimulus and personal relationship involved.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Recent studies have found that expressivity is facilitated or enhanced in the presence of friends, particularly expressivity of positive emotion.
“recent studies have found that expressivity is facilitated or enhanced in the presence of friends, particularly expressivity of positive emotion (Buck et al., 1992; Fridlund et al., 1992; Kring et al., 1995)”
From Sex differences in emotion: Expression, experience, and physiology. (1998) · cites this paper as Buck et al., 1992
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Toward a second-person neuroscience
Schilbach, L., Timmermans, B., Reddy, V., Costall, A., Bente, G., Schlicht, T., & Vogeley, K. (2013) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x12000660 · Cited by 1,510 · see citing works
Sex differences in emotion: Expression, experience, and physiology.
Kring, A. M., & Gordon, A. H. (1998) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.74.3.686 · Cited by 1,067 · see citing works
Eisenberg, N., Zhou, Q., Spinrad, T. L., Valiente, C., Fabes, R. A., & Liew, J. (2005) · Child Development · doi:10.1111/j.1467-8624.2005.00897.x · Cited by 895 · see citing works
Sex differences in the time course of emotion.
Gard, M. G., & Kring, A. M. (2007) · Emotion · doi:10.1037/1528-3542.7.2.429 · Cited by 146 · see citing works
Processing of emotion in functional neurological disorder
Sojka, P., Bareš, M., Kašpárek, T., & Světlák, M. (2018) · Frontiers in Psychiatry · doi:10.3389/fpsyt.2018.00479 · Cited by 46 · see citing works
Goldenberg, A. (2024) · Perspectives on Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/17456916231179154 · Cited by 14 · see citing works
- Authors
- Buck, R., Losow, J. I., Murphy, M. M., & Costanzo, P.
- Affiliations
- University of Connecticut (US)
- ORCID
- Buck, Ross
- Venue
- Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
- Published
- 1992
- Volume
- 63
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 962-968
- ISSN
- 0022-3514 (ISSN-L)
- 1939-1315
- OpenAlex
- W4254573337
- Cited by
- 211
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 43 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 3
- FWCI
- 4.73
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Personality and Social Psychology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institute of Mental Health (MH 40753, R01MH040753)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Emotions and Moral Behavior
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Attachment and Relationship Dynamics
- Keywords
- social facilitation, social inhibition, emotional expression, emotional communication
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Communication, Emotions, Female, Humans, Inhibition, Psychological, Interpersonal Relations, Male, Social Environment, Social Facilitation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review