Cited by 14Social and Intergroup PsychologyEmotions and Moral BehaviorSocial Power and Status Dynamics

What makes groups emotional?

Open access
Goldenberg, Amit·2024·Perspectives on Psychological Science

Abstract

When people experience emotions in a group, their emotions tend to have stronger intensity and to last longer. Why is that? This question has occupied thinkers throughout history, and with the use of digital media it is even more pressing today. Historically, attention has mainly focused on processes driven by the way emotions are shared between people via emotional interactions. Although interactions are a major driver of group emotionality, I review empirical findings that suggest that understanding group emotionality requires a broader view that integrates two additional processes: how emotions unfold within the social infrastructure in which they are shared and how these processes are affected by people’s cognition about emotions. I propose to summarize the literature using an infrastructure-cognition-interaction framework that contributes to a broader understanding of group emotionality, which should improve our ability to predict group emotionality and to change these emotions when they are undesired.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/17456916231179154

Cites

132 of 136 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Group emotionality should be understood as a product not only of interpersonal contagion but also of structural and contextual factors, including social infrastructure, shared cognition about emotions, and collective interaction patterns, which jointly shape both the intensity and duration of group emotions.

    “Recent work argues that group emotionality should be understood as a product not only of interpersonal contagion but also of structural and contextual factors-including social infrastructure, shared cognition about emotions, and collective interaction patterns-which jointly shape both the intensity and duration of group emotions (Goldenberg, 2024).”

    From The Groupfeel syndrome: a theory of a counterproductive group emotion (2026) · cites this paper as Goldenberg, 2024

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. Fan, R., Xu, K., & Zhao, J. (2016). Higher contagion and weaker ties mean anger spreads faster than joy in social media (Issue August). http://arxiv.org/abs/1608.03656 · arXiv
  2. Frijda, N. H. (1986). The emotions . Cambridge University Press.
  3. Turner, J. C. . (1982). Toward a cognitive definition of the group. In H. Tajfel (Ed.), Social Identities and Intergroup Relations (12th ed., Vol. 3, pp. 15-36). https://www.scirp.org/(S(i43dyn45teexjx455qlt3d2q))/reference/ReferencesPapers.aspx?ReferenceI D=649465
  4. Whitney, D., Haberman, J., & Sweeny, T. (2014). From textures to crowds: Multiple levels of summary statistical perception. In J. Werner & L. M. Chalupa (Eds.), The new visual neuroscience (pp. 695709). MIT Press.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Goldenberg, A.
Affiliations
Harvard University (US)
Corresponding author
Goldenberg, Amit
Venue
Perspectives on Psychological Science
Published
2023-07-26
Volume
19
Issue
2
Pages
489-502
ISSN
  • 1745-6916 (ISSN-L)
  • 1745-6924
OpenAlex
W4385263903
Cited by
14
References
134
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 2
FWCI
0.70
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Perspectives on Psychological Science (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • OSF Preprints (OSF Preprints) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • OSF Preprints (OSF Preprints) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Emotions and Moral Behavior
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social Power and Status Dynamics
Keywords
emotional intensity, emotion duration, emotional contagion, emotional interaction, social infrastructure, emotion cognition, emotion regulation, digital media
MeSH terms
Attention, Cognition, Emotions, Humans, Internet

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review