Flattering and unflattering personality portraits of integratively simple and complex managers.
Abstract
Research has revealed a good deal about both the situational determinants and judgmental and behavioral consequences of integrative complexity. Little is known, however, about people who are prone to think in integratively simple or complex ways. The present study fills this gap by drawing on data collected during in-depth assessments of master of business administration candidates. Integrative complexity was correlated with a broad range of self-report, observer-rating, semipro-jective, and managerial-simulation measures. Results revealed a more complex pattern of corre-lates than one would expect from the flattering theoretical portrayals of integrative complexity. On self-report measures, complex persons scored higher on openness and creativity and lower on social compliance and conscientiousness. On personality-observer ratings, they emerged as narcissistic and somewhat antagonistic. On managerial-observer ratings, complex persons emerged as higher on initiative and self-objectivity. On semiprojective measures, complex persons scored higher on power motivation. The integratively complex manager is reminiscent of creative architects, scien-tists, and writers who participated in previous assessments over the past 3 decades. The integrative complexity construct was originally con-ceived as an attempt to capture individual differences in styles
Cites (2)
- Accountability and complexity of thought.Tetlock, Philip E. · 1983 · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
- The disposition toward originalityBarron, Frank · 1955 · The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology
Cited by (6)
- Linguistic styles: language use as an individual differencePennebaker, James W., King, Laura A. · 1999 · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
- Conceptions and Correlates of Openness to ExperienceMcCrae, Robert R., Costa, Paul T. · 1997 · Handbook of Personality Psychology
- The impact of chief executive officer personality on top management team dynamics: One mechanism by which leadership affects organizational performancePeterson, Randall S., Smith, D. Brent, Martorana, Paul V., Owens, Pamela D. · 2003 · Journal of Applied Psychology
- Attachment style and the mental representation of the self.Mikulincer, Mario · 1995 · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
- Openness to ExperienceMcCrae, Robert R., Greenberg, David M. · 2014 · The Wiley Handbook of Genius
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Flattering and unflattering personality portraits of integratively simple and complex managers. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1037//0022-3514.64.3.500
- The paper
- Tetlock, P. E., Peterson, R. S., & Berry, J. M. (1993). Flattering and unflattering personality portraits of integratively simple and complex managers. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.64.3.500
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.