Some neo-Darwinian decision rules for altruism: Weighing cues for inclusive fitness as a function of the biological importance of the decision.

Burnstein, Eugene, Crandall, Christian, Kitayama, Shinobu·1994·Journal of Personality and Social Psychology

Abstract

A neo-Darwinian heuristic for decisions involving altruism is'hypothesized in this article. Following W. Hamilton's (1964) analysis of inclusive fitness, the assumption of this study is that tendencies to help another person are selected against, except when the donor and recipient are related and share genes underlying these tendencies. An important social psychological implication of Hamilton's formulation is that in group-living individuals (a) natural selection favors those who are prone to help others as a function of the latters' relatedness, potential fecundity, or other features indicating a recipient's capacity to enhance the donors' inclusive fitness, and (b) this effect is especially strong when help is biologically significant (e.g., the recipient will not survive otherwise). Such a heuristic is demonstrated in several studies involving hypothetical decisions to help: In life-or-death situations, people chose to aid close kin over distant kin, the young over the old, the healthy over the sick, the wealthy over the poor, and the premenopausal woman over the postmenopausal woman; whereas when it is a matter of an everyday favor, they gave less weight to kinship and opted to help either the very young or the very old over those of intermediate age, the sick over the healthy, and the poor over the wealthy.

Cites (3)

  1. The genetical theory of natural selection
    Fisher, Ronald Aylmer · 1930
  2. Sex differences in human mate preferences: Evolutionary hypotheses tested in 37 cultures
    Buss, David M. · 1989 · Behavioral and Brain Sciences
  3. Ten years of research on group size and helping.
    Latané, Bibb, Nida, Steve · 1981 · Psychological Bulletin

Show all 3 references

Cited by (23)

  1. Prosocial Behavior: Multilevel Perspectives
    Penner., Louis A., Dovidio., John F., Piliavin., Jane A., Schroeder., David A. · 2005 · Annual Review of Psychology
  2. Compassion: an evolutionary analysis and empirical review
    Goetz, Jennifer L., Keltner, Dacher, Simon-Thomas, Emiliana · 2010 · Psychological Bulletin
  3. Fears of compassion: Development of three self‐report measures
    Gilbert, Paul, McEwan, Kirsten, Matos, Marcela, Rivis, Amanda · 2011 · Psychology and Psychotherapy: Theory, Research and Practice
  4. Nice Guys Finish First: The Competitive Altruism Hypothesis
    Hardy, Charlie L., Van Vugt, Mark · 2006 · Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin
  5. Psychological universals: what are they and how can we know?
    Norenzayan, Ara, Heine, Steven J. · 2005 · Psychological Bulletin

See all 557

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Some neo-Darwinian decision rules for altruism: Weighing cues for inclusive fitness as a function of the biological importance of the decision. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1037//0022-3514.67.5.773
The paper
Burnstein, E., Crandall, C., & Kitayama, S. (1994). Some neo-Darwinian decision rules for altruism: Weighing cues for inclusive fitness as a function of the biological importance of the decision. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.67.5.773

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.