Teasing in hierarchical and intimate relations.

Abstract

Following E. Goffman's (1967) face threat analysis of social interaction, it was hypothesized that the aggressive, playful content of teasing would vary according to social status and relational satisfaction, personality, role as teaser or target, and gender. These 4 hypotheses were tested in analyses of the teasing among fraternity members (Study 1) and romantic couples (Study 2). Consistent with a face threat analysis of teasing, low-status fraternity members and satisfied romantic partners teased in more prosocial ways, defined by reduced face threat and increased redressive action. Some findings indicate that disagreeable individuals teased in less prosocial ways, consistent with studies of bullying. Targets reported more negative emotion than teasers. Although female and male romantic partners teased each other in similar ways, women found being the target of teasing more aversive, consistent with previous speculation.

Cites (5)

1. The need to belong: Desire for interpersonal attachments as a fundamental human motivation.
   Baumeister, Roy F., Leary, Mark R. · 1995 · Psychological Bulletin
2. Conventional wisdom on measurement: A structural equation perspective.
   Bollen, Kenneth, Lennox, Richard · 1991 · Psychological Bulletin
3. Short Marital-Adjustment and Prediction Tests: Their Reliability and Validity
   Locke, Harvey J., Wallace, Karl M. · 1959 · Marriage and Family Living
4. Untitled work
   1984 · 10.4324/9781315798806-24
5. Embarrassment: its distinct form and appeasement functions
   Keltner, Dacher, Buswell, Brenda N. · 1997 · Psychological Bulletin

Show all 5 references

Cited by (21)

1. Power, approach, and inhibition.
   Keltner, Dacher, Gruenfeld, Deborah H., Anderson, Cameron · 2003 · Psychological Review
2. Cues to deception
   DePaulo, Bella M., Lindsay, James J., Malone, Brian E., Muhlenbruck, Laura, Charlton, Kelly, Cooper, Harris · 2003 · Psychological Bulletin
3. Social Functions of Emotions at Four Levels of Analysis
   Keltner, Dacher, Haidt, Jonathan · 1999 · Cognition and Emotion
4. Who attains social status? Effects of personality and physical attractiveness in social groups.
   Anderson, Cameron, John, Oliver P., Keltner, Dacher, Kring, Ann M. · 2001 · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
5. Emotion, Social Function, and Psychopathology
   Keltner, Dacher, Kring, Ann M. · 1998 · Review of General Psychology

See all 430