Toward an explanation of cultural differences in in-group favoritism: The role of individual versus collective primacy.
Abstract
Previous research conducted on a Westem sample has shown that people are less apt to exhibit in-group favoritism when they perform well individually while their in-group performs poorly. The authors evaluated whether this finding would be moderated by the cultural dimension of individualcollective primacy, which refers to whether people give more weight to their personal interests rather than their in-group's interests when forced to choose between the two. The authors hypothesized that relative to their counterparts from the United States, participants from the People's Republic of China would have more of a collective-primacy orientation and therefore would exhibit more in-group favoritism when they performed well individually while their in-group performed poorly. The results supported the hypothesis. Implications for the literatures on in-group favoritism and cross-cultural differences are discussed.
Cites (7)
- The Social Identity Theory of Intergroup BehaviorTajfel, Henri, Turner, John C. · 2004 · Political Psychology
- Illusion and well‐being: A social psychological perspective on mental healthTaylor, Shelley E., Brown, Jonathon D. · 1988 · Psychological Bulletin
- The self and social behavior in differing cultural contexts.Triandis, Harry C. · 1989 · Psychological Review
- Basking in reflected glory: Three (football) field studies.Cialdini, Robert B., Borden, Richard J., Thorne, Avril, Walker, Marcus Randall, Freeman, Stephen, Sloan, Lloyd Reynolds · 1976 · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
- Culture and cause: American and Chinese attributions for social and physical events.Morris, Michael W., Peng, Kaiping · 1994 · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
- EAST MEETS WEST MEETS MIDEAST: FURTHER EXPLORATIONS OF COLLECTIVISTIC AND INDIVIDUALISTIC WORK GROUPS.Earley, P. C. · 1993 · Academy of Management Journal
- Values, national identification and favouritism towards the in‐groupFeather, N. T. · 1994 · British Journal of Social Psychology
Cited by (16)
- Rethinking individualism and collectivism: Evaluation of theoretical assumptions and meta-analyses.Oyserman, Daphna, Coon, Heather M., Kemmelmeier, Markus · 2002 · Psychological Bulletin
- Cross-Cultural Organizational BehaviorGelfand, Michele J., Erez, Miriam, Aycan, Zeynep · 2007 · Annual Review of Psychology
- Where (who) are collectives in collectivism? Toward conceptual clarification of individualism and collectivismBrewer, Marilynn B., Chen, Ya-Ru · 2007 · Psychological Review
- Examining the impact of culture’s consequences: A three-decade, multilevel, meta-analytic review of Hofstede’s cultural value dimensionsTaras, Vas, Kirkman, Bradley L., Steel, Piers · 2010 · Journal of Applied Psychology
- The relational self: An interpersonal social-cognitive theory.Susan M. Andersen, Serena Chen · 2002 · Psychological Review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Toward an explanation of cultural differences in in-group favoritism: The role of individual versus collective primacy. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1037//0022-3514.75.6.1490
- The paper
- Chen, Y.-R., Brockner, J., & Katz, T. (1998). Toward an explanation of cultural differences in in-group favoritism: The role of individual versus collective primacy. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.75.6.1490
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.