The DOI matches its Crossref record; 18 of the 18 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Private self-consciousness and the five-factor model of personality: Distinguishing rumination from reflection.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Reflection is an adaptive form of self-focus motivated by curiosity (Trapnell & Campbell, 1999)”
From Effects of a Mindfulness-Based Weight Loss Intervention on Long-term Psychological Well-being Among Adults with Obesity: Secondary Analyses from the Supporting Health by Integrating Nutrition and Exercise (SHINE) Trial (2022) · cites this paper as Trapnell & Campbell, 1999
In the citing paper
“The Rumination Reflection Questionnaire (RRQ; Trapnell & Campbell, 1999) is valid and reliable 12-item measure of rumination.”
From Testing Mindfulness Mechanisms of Action on the Stress and Burnout of Social Workers (2024) · cites this paper as Trapnell & Campbell, 1999
In the citing paper
“Trapnell and Campbell (1999) reported the rumination subscale exhibited good convergent and discriminant validity.”
From A randomised trial of Mindfulness-based Social Work and Self-Care with social workers (2023) · cites this paper as Trapnell & Campbell, 1999
In the citing paper
“The measure has good psychometric properties; the rumination scale has a Cronbach ' s alpha of 0.90, and the reflection scale has a Cronbach ' s alpha of 0.91.”
From Guided self-help for depression in autistic adults: The ADEPT feasibility RCT (2019) · cites this paper as [66]
Citations
Cites
The publisher hasn’t deposited this paper’s reference list.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The benefits of being present: Mindfulness and its role in psychological well-being
Brown, K. W., & Ryan, R. M. (2003) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.84.4.822 · Cited by 13,448
Gross, J. J., & John, O. P. (2003) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.85.2.348 · Cited by 11,929
Emotion-regulation strategies across psychopathology: A meta-analytic review
Aldao, A., Nolen-Hoeksema, S., & Schweizer, S. (2010) · Clinical Psychology Review · doi:10.1016/j.cpr.2009.11.004 · Cited by 6,686
Mindfulness: A proposed operational definition.
Bishop, S. R., Lau, M., Shapiro, S., Carlson, L., Anderson, N. D., Carmody, J., Segal, Z. V., Abbey, S., Speca, M., Velting, D., et al. (2004) · Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice · doi:10.1093/clipsy.bph077 · Cited by 7,234
Nolen-Hoeksema, S., Wisco, B. E., & Lyubomirsky, S. (2008) · Perspectives on Psychological Science · doi:10.1111/j.1745-6924.2008.00088.x · Cited by 5,172
Metadata
- Authors
- Trapnell, P. D., & Campbell, J. D.
- Venue
- Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
- Published
- 1999
- Volume
- 76
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 284-304
- ISSN
- 0022-3514 (ISSN-L)
- 1939-1315
- OpenAlex
- W4294294090
- Cited by
- 1,646
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 95 · 2025: 97 · 2024: 86 · 2023: 101 · 2022: 115 · 2021: 120 · 2020: 104 · 2019: 101 · 2018: 89 · 2017: 97 · 2016: 94 · 2015: 70 · 2014: 60 · 2013: 54 · 2012: 54
- FWCI
- 10.87
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Personality and Social Psychology (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Traits and Psychology
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Identity, Memory, and Therapy
- Keywords
- private self-consciousness, Big Five personality traits, rumination, reflection, personality traits, self-consciousness
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
