Pro-norm and anti-norm deviance within and between groups.

Abrams, Dominic, Marques, José M., Bown, Nicola, Henson, Michelle·2000·Journal of Personality and Social Psychology

Abstract

Participants evaluated other individuals who deviated in either an anti- or pro-normative direction relative to normative members. In Study 1, in-group gender-normative members were rated more positively than deviant members. The pro-norm deviant was viewed as more attractive than the anti-norm deviant. In Study 2 anti-norm in-group deviants were evaluated more negatively than anti-norm out-group deviants even though both held identical attitudes. In both studies, despite objective equivalence, pro-norm deviance was perceived as less "atypical" than anti-norm deviance. Judgments and reactions to deviance depend on group membership and the direction of deviance, not just its magnitude. Evaluations of deviants are also related to perceivers' identification with their own group. These findings are consistent with our model of subjective group dynamics.

Cited by (14)

  1. Social Identity Theory and Self‐categorization Theory: A Historical Review
    Hornsey, Matthew J. · 2008 · Social and Personality Psychology Compass
  2. Social Identity, Self-Categorization, and the Communication of Group Norms
    Hogg, Michael A., Reid, Scott A. · 2006 · Communication Theory
  3. Religiosity as Identity: Toward an Understanding of Religion From a Social Identity Perspective
    Ysseldyk, Renate, Matheson, Kimberly, Anisman, Hymie · 2010 · Personality and Social Psychology Review
  4. The impact of social norms on entrepreneurial action: Evidence from the environmental entrepreneurship context
    Meek, William R., Pacheco, Desirée F., York, Jeffrey G. · 2010 · Journal of Business Venturing
  5. Two axes of subordination: A new model of racial position.
    Zou, Linda X., Cheryan, Sapna · 2017 · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology

See all 353

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Pro-norm and anti-norm deviance within and between groups. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1037//0022-3514.78.5.906
The paper
Abrams, D., Marques, J. M., Bown, N., & Henson, M. (2000). Pro-norm and anti-norm deviance within and between groups. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.78.5.906

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.