Cited by 119Social and Intergroup PsychologyPersonality Traits and PsychologyDecision-Making and Behavioral Economics

Processing alternative explanations of behavior: Correction or integration?

Open access
Trope, Yaacov, Gaunt, Ruth·2000·Journal of Personality and Social Psychology

Abstract

Three experiments investigated how activation of knowledge about situational forces affects discounting in dispositional inference tasks. Each experiment varied a different knowledge activation factor--salience, accessibility, or specificity of situational information. In addition, all 3 experiments varied situational demands and cognitive load. The results showed that cognitive load eliminated discounting when situational information was low in salience, accessibility, or specificity. However, when situational information was more salient, accessible, or specific, it produced strong discounting effects even when perceivers were under cognitive load. These results are discussed in terms of correction and integration models of dispositional inferences from behavior.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/0022-3514.79.3.344

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Trope, Y., & Gaunt, R.
Venue
Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
Published
2000
Volume
79
Issue
3
Pages
344-354
ISSN
  • 0022-3514 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-1315
OpenAlex
W2000130034
Cited by
119
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 3
FWCI
9.72
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Journal of Personality and Social Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Lincoln Repository (University of Lincoln) (acceptedVersion)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
National Institute of Mental Health (1 R01 MH59030-01A1, R01MH059030)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Traits and Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › General Decision Sciences › Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
Keywords
dispositional inference, situational influences, discounting, knowledge activation, cognitive load, salience, accessibility, specificity, correction model, integration model, explanation of behavior
MeSH terms
Adult, Attention, Attitude, Awareness, Female, Humans, Interpersonal Relations, Male, Social Behavior, Social Environment

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review