Cited by 594Child and Animal Learning DevelopmentSpatial Cognition and NavigationSocial and Intergroup Psychology

Perspective taking in children and adults: equivalent egocentrism but differential correction

Epley, Nicholas, Morewedge, Carey K, Keysar, Boaz·2004·Journal of Experimental Social Psychology

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jesp.2004.02.002

Cites

59 of 59 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Epley, N., Morewedge, C. K., & Keysar, B.
Affiliations
  • Harvard University (US)
  • University of Chicago (US)
Venue
Journal of Experimental Social Psychology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2004-11
Volume
40
Issue
6
Pages
760-768
ISSN
0022-1031 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2165829812
Cited by
594
References
56
Citations by year
2026: 14 · 2025: 20 · 2024: 22 · 2023: 34 · 2022: 54 · 2021: 38 · 2020: 27 · 2019: 64 · 2018: 40 · 2017: 36 · 2016: 42 · 2015: 33 · 2014: 20 · 2013: 24 · 2012: 24
FWCI
20.90
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Experimental Social Psychology (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation (SES-0241544)
  • Presbyterian Historical Society (R01 MH49685-06A1)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Child and Animal Learning Development
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Automotive Engineering › Spatial Cognition and Navigation
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
Keywords
perspective taking, self-centeredness, children versus adults, referential communication, eye movements, dual-process theory, automatic versus controlled processing, theory of mind

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review