Self-concordance, goal attainment, and the pursuit of happiness: Can there be an upward spiral?
Abstract
Two studies used the self-concordance model of healthy goal striving (K. M. Sheldon & A. J. Elliot, 1999) to examine the motivational processes by which people can increase their level of well-being during a period of time and then maintain the gain or perhaps increase it even further during the next period of time. In Study 1, entering freshmen with self-concordant motivation better attained their 1st-semester goals, which in turn predicted increased adjustment and greater self-concordance for the next semester's goals. Increased self-concordance in turn predicted even better goal attainment during the 2nd semester, which led to further increases in adjustment and to higher levels of ego development by the end of the year. Study 2 replicated the basic model in a 2-week study of short-term goals set in the laboratory. Limits of the model and implications for the question of how (and whether) happiness may be increased are discussed.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Purpose in life produces approach-oriented behavior, with effort directed toward rather than away from purpose-related goals.
“Purpose in life generates approach oriented behaviors where there is effort toward, not away, from purpose-related goals”
From Commitment to a purpose in life: An antidote to the suffering by individuals with social anxiety disorder. (2013) · cites this paper as Sheldon & Houser-Marko, 2001
The four reasons for pursuing strivings scales have been shown to be psychometrically sound in prior work.
“These scales have been previously shown to be psychometrically sound (Koestner, Lekes, Powers, & Chicoine, 2002; Sheldon & Elliot, 1998; Sheldon & Houser-Marko, 2001).”
From Commitment to a purpose in life: An antidote to the suffering by individuals with social anxiety disorder. (2013) · cites this paper as Sheldon & Houser-Marko, 2001
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 66 · Cited by 663
- Authors
- Sheldon, K. M., & Houser-Marko, L.
- Affiliations
- University of Missouri (US)
- ORCID
- Sheldon, Kennon M.
- Venue
- Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
- Published
- 2001
- Volume
- 80
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 152-165
- ISSN
- 0022-3514 (ISSN-L)
- 1939-1315
- OpenAlex
- W2091460783
- Cited by
- 663
- References
- 66
- Citations by year
- 2026: 7 · 2025: 24 · 2024: 29 · 2023: 26 · 2022: 46 · 2021: 28 · 2020: 22 · 2019: 36 · 2018: 45 · 2017: 35 · 2016: 28 · 2015: 51 · 2014: 33 · 2013: 28 · 2012: 45
- FWCI
- 14.78
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Personality and Social Psychology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Motivation and Self-Concept in Sports
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Behavioral Health and Interventions
- Keywords
- self-concordance, goal achievement, goal pursuit, well-being, happiness, upward spiral, ego development, student adaptation, goal setting, motivation
- MeSH terms
- Adolescent, Adult, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Goals, Humans, Male, Missouri, Motivation, Prospective Studies, Surveys and Questionnaires, Self-Assessment, Social Adjustment, Students, Universities, Self Efficacy
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review