The experience of power: Examining the effects of power on approach and inhibition tendencies.

Abstract

Two studies of task-focused dyads tested the approach/inhibition theory of power (D. Keltner, D. H. Gruenfeld, & C. Anderson, in press), which posits that having power increases the tendency to approach and decreases the tendency to inhibit. Results provided preliminary support for the theory: Participants higher in personality dominance or assigned control over resources expressed their true attitudes, experienced more positive and less negative emotion, were more likely to perceive rewards (i.e., that their partner liked them), and were less likely to perceive threats (e.g., that their partner felt anger toward them). Most of these effects were mediated by the sense of power, suggesting that subjective feelings of power are an important component in the effects of power.

Cites (10)

1. Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: The PANAS scales.
   Watson, David, Clark, Lee Anna, Tellegen, Auke · 1988 · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
2. Stereotype threat and the intellectual test performance of African Americans.
   Steele, Claude M., Aronson, Joshua · 1995 · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
3. Beyond pleasure and pain
   Higgins, E. Tory · 1997 · American Psychologist
4. Behavioral Study of obedience.
   Milgram, Stanley · 1963 · The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology
5. Power, approach, and inhibition.
   Keltner, Dacher, Gruenfeld, Deborah H., Anderson, Cameron · 2003 · Psychological Review
6. A neuropsychological theory of positive affect and its influence on cognition.
   Ashby, F. Gregory, Isen, Alice M., Turken, And U. · 1999 · Psychological Review
7. Prefrontal Brain Asymmetry: A Biological Substrate of the Behavioral Approach and Inhibition Systems
   Sutton, Steven K., Davidson, Richard J. · 1997 · Psychological Science
8. Who attains social status? Effects of personality and physical attractiveness in social groups.
   Anderson, Cameron, John, Oliver P., Keltner, Dacher, Kring, Ann M. · 2001 · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
9. Facial expressions of emotion influence interpersonal trait inferences
   Knutson, Brian · 1996 · Journal of Nonverbal Behavior
10. Prestige and Culture: A Biosocial Interpretation [and Comments and Replies]
    Barkow, Jerome H., Akiwowo, Akinsola A., Barua, Tushar K., Chance, M. R. A., Chapple, Eliot D., Chattopadhyay, Gouranga P., Freedman, Daniel G., Geddes, W. R., Goswami, B. B., Isichei, P. A. C. et al. · 1975 · Current Anthropology

Show all 10 references

Cited by (29)

1. 8 Social Hierarchy: The Self‐Reinforcing Nature of Power and Status
   Magee, Joe C., Galinsky, Adam D. · 2008 · Academy of Management Annals
2. Power reduces the press of the situation: Implications for creativity, conformity, and dissonance.
   Galinsky, Adam D., Magee, Joe C., Gruenfeld, Deborah H, Whitson, Jennifer A., Liljenquist, Katie A. · 2008 · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
3. Pride, personality, and the evolutionary foundations of human social status
   Cheng, Joey T., Tracy, Jessica L., Henrich, Joseph · 2010 · Evolution and Human Behavior
4. Emotional convergence between people over time.
   Anderson, Cameron, Keltner, Dacher, John, Oliver P. · 2003 · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
5. The social distance theory of power
   Magee, Joe C., Smith, Pamela K. · 2013 · Personality and Social Psychology Review

See all 921