Prestige and Culture: A Biosocial Interpretation [and Comments and Replies]
Abstract
Examination of human prestige-striving in phylogenetic perspective suggests it to be essentially homologous with primate social dominance. In our own species, however, selection for "cultural capacity" has transformed striving for social dominance into striving to evaluate the self as being higher in rank than others or, in other words, into striving for self-esteem. We maintain self-esteem through symbolic means, usually referred to as seeking "prestige." We also utilize various distortions of perception and cognition to this end, including rationalization, identification, and change of reference group. Prestige strategies may emphasize attaining prestige through being part of a prestigious group or may be more individualistically oriented. They may also stress receipt of the approbation of internal representations of absent or imaginary others or emphasize the respect of those physically present. Traditional societies provide culturally patterned strategies which tend to perpetuate these societies. Thus, success in the hunt brings prestige among hunting peoples, large herds among pastoralists, etc. Culturally constituted rationalizations help to maintain the self-esteem of those who fail. Culture contact is one of the chief causes of the failure of prestige-allocation systems, the very existence of wealthy and powerful newcomers devaluing the coin of the prestige obtainable through traditional strategies. Newly development prestige strategies are likely to have deleterious…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In human and animal cultural accumulation, selection of the best performing agent is learned through prestige cues.
“In human and animal cultural accumulation, this selection is instead learned through prestige cues Barkow et al. [1975], Horner et al. [2010].”
From Artificial Generational Intelligence: Cultural Accumulation in Reinforcement Learning (2024) · cites this paper as Barkow et al. [1975]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Is the desire for status a fundamental human motive? A review of the empirical literature.
Anderson, C., Hildreth, J. A. D., & Howland, L. (2015) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/a0038781 · Cited by 1,133 · see citing works
Rieger, E., Van Buren, D. J., Bishop, M., Tanofsky-Kraff, M., Welch, R., & Wilfley, D. E. (2010) · Clinical Psychology Review · doi:10.1016/j.cpr.2010.02.001 · Cited by 279 · see citing works
Prestige Affects Cultural Learning in Chimpanzees
Horner, V., Proctor, D., Bonnie, K. E., Whiten, A., & de Waal, F. B. M. (2010) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0010625 · Cited by 245 · see citing works
The nature and expression of social phobia: Toward a new classification
Hofmann, S. G., Heinrichs, N., & Moscovitch, D. A. (2004) · Clinical Psychology Review · doi:10.1016/j.cpr.2004.07.004 · Cited by 202 · see citing works
Rohmann, E., Hanke, S., & Bierhoff, H.-W. (2019) · Journal of Individual Differences · doi:10.1027/1614-0001/a000292 · Cited by 77 · see citing works
Artificial Generational Intelligence: Cultural Accumulation in Reinforcement Learning
Cook, J., Lu, C., Hughes, E., Leibo, J. Z., & Foerster, J. (2024) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2406.00392 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
“In human and animal cultural accumulation, this selection is instead learned through prestige cues Barkow et al. [1975], Horner et al. [2010].”
Background
- Authors
- Barkow, J. H., Akiwowo, A. A., Barua, T. K., Chance, M. R. A., Chapple, E. D., Chattopadhyay, G. P., Freedman, D. G., Geddes, W. R., Goswami, B. B., Isichei, P. A. C., Knudson, M. S., Manson, S. M., Parker, C. E., Price, J. A., & Sarles, H. B.
- Affiliations
- Dalhousie University (CA)
- Venue
- Current Anthropology
- Publisher
- University of Chicago Press
- Published
- 1975-12
- Volume
- 16
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 553-572
- ISSN
- 0011-3204 (ISSN-L)
- 1537-5382
- OpenAlex
- W2258791270
- Cited by
- 288
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 18 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 21 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 13 · 2013: 13 · 2012: 12
- FWCI
- 4.71
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Current Anthropology (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social Power and Status Dynamics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Cultural Dynamics
- Keywords
- prestige, social dominance, self-esteem, cultural capacity, primate social behavior, rationalization, identification, reference groups, traditional society, cultural contact, need for achievement, social stability, hunting societies, pastoralists
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review