Cited by 288Evolutionary Psychology and Human BehaviorSocial Power and Status DynamicsSocial and Cultural Dynamics

Prestige and Culture: A Biosocial Interpretation [and Comments and Replies]

Barkow, Jerome H., Akiwowo, Akinsola A., Barua, Tushar K., Chance, M. R. A., Chapple, Eliot D., Chattopadhyay, Gouranga P., Freedman, Daniel G., Geddes, W. R. +7 more·1975·Current Anthropology

Abstract

Examination of human prestige-striving in phylogenetic perspective suggests it to be essentially homologous with primate social dominance. In our own species, however, selection for "cultural capacity" has transformed striving for social dominance into striving to evaluate the self as being higher in rank than others or, in other words, into striving for self-esteem. We maintain self-esteem through symbolic means, usually referred to as seeking "prestige." We also utilize various distortions of perception and cognition to this end, including rationalization, identification, and change of reference group. Prestige strategies may emphasize attaining prestige through being part of a prestigious group or may be more individualistically oriented. They may also stress receipt of the approbation of internal representations of absent or imaginary others or emphasize the respect of those physically present. Traditional societies provide culturally patterned strategies which tend to perpetuate these societies. Thus, success in the hunt brings prestige among hunting peoples, large herds among pastoralists, etc. Culturally constituted rationalizations help to maintain the self-esteem of those who fail. Culture contact is one of the chief causes of the failure of prestige-allocation systems, the very existence of wealthy and powerful newcomers devaluing the coin of the prestige obtainable through traditional strategies. Newly development prestige strategies are likely to have deleterious…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1086/201619

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In human and animal cultural accumulation, selection of the best performing agent is learned through prestige cues.

    “In human and animal cultural accumulation, this selection is instead learned through prestige cues Barkow et al. [1975], Horner et al. [2010].”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Barkow, J. H., Akiwowo, A. A., Barua, T. K., Chance, M. R. A., Chapple, E. D., Chattopadhyay, G. P., Freedman, D. G., Geddes, W. R., Goswami, B. B., Isichei, P. A. C., Knudson, M. S., Manson, S. M., Parker, C. E., Price, J. A., & Sarles, H. B.
Affiliations
Dalhousie University (CA)
Venue
Current Anthropology
Published
1975-12
Volume
16
Issue
4
Pages
553-572
ISSN
  • 0011-3204 (ISSN-L)
  • 1537-5382
OpenAlex
W2258791270
Cited by
288
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 18 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 21 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 13 · 2013: 13 · 2012: 12
FWCI
4.71
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Current Anthropology (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social Power and Status Dynamics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Cultural Dynamics
Keywords
prestige, social dominance, self-esteem, cultural capacity, primate social behavior, rationalization, identification, reference groups, traditional society, cultural contact, need for achievement, social stability, hunting societies, pastoralists

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review