Does repressive coping promote resilience? Affective-autonomic response discrepancy during bereavement.
Abstract
Traditional theories of coping emphasize the value of attending to and expressing negative emotion while recovering from traumatic life events. However, recent evidence suggests that the tendency to direct attention away from negative affective experience (i.e., repressive coping) may promote resilience following extremely aversive events (e.g., the death of a spouse). The current study extends this line of investigation by showing that both bereaved and nonbereaved individuals who exhibited repressive coping behavior--as measured by the discrepancy between affective experience and sympathetic nervous system response--had fewer symptoms of psychopathology, experienced fewer health problems and somatic complaints, and were rated as better adjusted by close friends than those who did not exhibit repressive coping. Results are discussed in terms of recent developments in cognitive and neuroimaging research suggesting that repressive coping may serve a protective function.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Concordance between emotional reactivity and physiological reactivity has been identified as a potential transdiagnostic marker of psychopathology.
“Concordance between emotional reactivity and physiological reactivity has been identified as a potential transdiagnostic marker of psychopathology (Calvo & Miguel-Tobal, 1999; Coifman, Bonanno, Ray, & Gross, 2007; Marx et al., 2012; Sallis, Lichstein & McGlynn, 1980; Zahn, Nurnberger, Berrettini, & Robinson, 1991)”
From Dispositional Mindfulness Uncouples Physiological and Emotional Reactivity to a Laboratory Stressor and Emotional Reactivity to Executive Functioning Lapses in Daily Life (2016) · cites this paper as Coifman, Bonanno, Ray, & Gross, 2007
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 114 · Cited by 222
- Authors
- Coifman, K. G., Bonanno, G. A., Ray, R. D., & Gross, J. J.
- Affiliations
- Columbia University (US)
- Stanford University (US)
- Venue
- Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
- Published
- 2007-04
- Volume
- 92
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 745-758
- ISSN
- 0022-3514 (ISSN-L)
- 1939-1315
- OpenAlex
- W2108296271
- Cited by
- 222
- References
- 114
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 16 · 2013: 16 · 2012: 21
- FWCI
- 18.27
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Personality and Social Psychology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institutes of Health (R29-MH57274)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Grief, Bereavement, and Mental Health
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Resilience and Mental Health
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Death Anxiety and Social Exclusion
- Keywords
- repressive coping, resilience, bereavement, grief, sympathetic nervous system, negative affect, emotion regulation, psychopathology, somatic symptoms, social adaptation
- MeSH terms
- Adaptation, Psychological, Affect, Autonomic Nervous System, Bereavement, Humans
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review