The DOI matches its Crossref record; 63 of the 63 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Why people are reluctant to tempt fate.
Abstract
The present research explored the belief that it is bad luck to "tempt fate." Studies 1 and 2 demonstrated that people do indeed have the intuition that actions that tempt fate increase the likelihood of negative outcomes. Studies 3-6 examined our claim that the intuition is due, in large part, to the combination of the automatic tendencies to attend to negative prospects and to use accessibility as a cue when judging likelihood. Study 3 demonstrated that negative outcomes are more accessible following actions that tempt fate than following actions that do not tempt fate. Studies 4 and 5 demonstrated that the heightened accessibility of negative outcomes mediates the elevated perceptions of likelihood. Finally, Study 6 examined the automatic nature of the underlying processes. The types of actions that are thought to tempt fate as well as the role of society and culture in shaping this magical belief are discussed.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Likelihood estimations were lower when fate was tempted”
From Diminished diversity-of-thought in a standard large language model (2024) · cites this paper as Risen & Gilovich, 2008
Citations
Cites
Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.51.6.1173 · Cited by 91,532
Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk
Kahneman, D. J., & Tversky, A. (1988) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511609220.014 · Cited by 32,720
Availability: A heuristic for judging frequency and probability
Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1973) · Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.1016/0010-0285(73)90033-9 · Cited by 9,984
Baumeister, R. F., Bratslavsky, E., Finkenauer, C., & Vohs, K. D. (2001) · Review of General Psychology · doi:10.1037/1089-2680.5.4.323 · Cited by 7,678
(1999) · Cited by 6,104
A perspective on judgment and choice: mapping bounded rationality.
Kahneman, D. (2003) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/0003-066x.58.9.697 · Cited by 5,540
Social psychology: handbook of basic principles
Higgins, E., & Kruglanski, A. (2008) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.45-3496 · Cited by 5,535
Anomalies: The Endowment Effect, Loss Aversion, and Status Quo Bias
Kahneman, D., Knetsch, J. L., & Thaler, R. H. (1991) · Journal of Economic Perspectives · doi:10.1257/jep.5.1.193 · Cited by 5,019
Negativity Bias, Negativity Dominance, and Contagion
Rozin, P., & Royzman, E. B. (2001) · Personality and Social Psychology Review · doi:10.1207/s15327957pspr0504_2 · Cited by 4,342
(1987) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 4,269
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 101–138 of 138
Anxiety, Cognitive Availability, and the Talisman Effect of Insurance
Schindler, R. M., Isaac, M. S., Dolansky, E., & Adams, G. C. (2022) · Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin · doi:10.1177/01461672221077791 · Cited by 2
Goyal, N., Savani, K., & Morris, M. W. (2023) · Journal of Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2023.104458 · Cited by 2
The Ethical Principles of the Portuguese Psychologists: An Empirical Approach
Ricou, M., Sá, E., & Nunes, R. (2018) · The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy A Forum for Bioethics and Philosophy of Medicine · doi:10.1093/jmp/jhy036 · Cited by 2
Fatalism, superstition, religion, and culture : road user beliefs and behaviour in Pakistan
Kayani, A. (2011) · Centre for Accident Research & Road Safety - Qld (CARRS-Q); Faculty of Health; Institute of Health and Biomedical Innovation · Cited by 2
Dissertation R.C.M. van AertPreprint
van Aert, R. C. M. (2018) · MetArXiv (OSF Preprints) · doi:10.31222/osf.io/eqhjd · Cited by 3
Uncertainty-Driven Moral BehaviorPreprint
Chen, Y., & Zhong, S. (2020) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.3737959 · Cited by 2
van Aert, R. C. M., & van Assen, M. A. L. M. (2017) · PsyArXiv (OSF Preprints) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/ft3tu · Cited by 2
Laypeople Can Predict Which Social Science Studies ReplicatePreprint
Hoogeveen, S., Sarafoglou, A., & Wagenmakers, E. (2019) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/egw9d · Cited by 2
Vaccine hesitancy and the reluctance to “tempt fate”
Ichino, A. (2022) · Philosophical Psychology · doi:10.1080/09515089.2022.2096432 · Cited by 1
Avoiding Financial Information: The Roles of Fate and Money Beliefs
Montford, W. J., & Timmerman, I. (2024) · Journal of Consumer Behaviour · doi:10.1002/cb.2410 · Cited by 1
Superstitious–magical imaginings
Ichino, A. (2024) · Analysis · doi:10.1093/analys/anae043 · Cited by 1
Spirit is Contagious: How Blind-box Offerings Affect Tourist Responses in Spiritual Destinations
Chen, X., & Xue, X. (2025) · Journal of Hospitality & Tourism Research · doi:10.1177/10963480251391403 · Cited by 1
Marshall, A. J. (2014) · Palgrave Macmillan UK eBooks · doi:10.1057/9781137345752_9 · Cited by 1
Kissing the mezuzah and cognitive performance: Is there an observable benefit?
Siniver, E., & Yaniv, G. (2015) · Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization · doi:10.1016/j.jebo.2015.05.015 · Cited by 1
THE EFFECT OF PERCEIVED SIMILARITY ON SEQUENTIAL RISK-TAKING
Webb, E. C., & Shu, S. B. (2018) · Journal of Marketing Research · doi:10.1509/jmr.15.0479 · Cited by 12
Vo, K., & Choe, Y. (2024) · Journal of the Association for Consumer Research · doi:10.1086/733043 · Cited by 1
The Perception of Mistakes Driven by Cognitive Biases: An Experimental StudyPreprint
Severin, R. (2023) · Preprints.org · doi:10.20944/preprints202304.0643.v1
How people interpret and react to everyday automation issues
Preusse, K. C. (2016) · SMARTech Repository (Georgia Institute of Technology)
van Wolferen, J. (2014) · Research portal (Tilburg University)
McDowell, M. (2011) · Griffith Research Online · doi:10.25904/1912/230
Chen, J. M. (2016) · doi:10.37419/lr.v3.i4.1
Hollander, M., Wolfe, D. A., & Chicken, E. (2015) · Wiley series in probability and statistics · doi:10.1002/9781119196037.biblio
When Goods Were Odds: Do People Prefer Uncertain Goods After Uncertainty Is Resolved?Preprint
Hu, B., Yin, S., & Moon, A. (2023) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.4001081
Levy, N. L. (2024) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780198872221.003.0007
Powdthavee, N., Riyanto, Y. E., & Zhang, X. (2024) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.5038226
Baruh, L., Sen, C. K. N., Cemalcılar, Z., & Kumkale, G. T. (2025) · SAGE Open · doi:10.1177/21582440241300482 · Cited by 1
Organ Donation Decisions: When Deviating from the Status Quo Heightens Perceived Vulnerability
Motsenok, M., & Kogut, T. (2025) · Medical Decision Making · doi:10.1177/0272989x251346213
Allies or Enemies: Zodiac Relationships in Leadership and Firm PerformancePreprint
Zhao, G., Liu, Z., Zheng, X., & Jiang, Z. (2025) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.5340994
Many Labs 5: Testing pre-data collection peer review as an intervention to increase replicabilityPreprint
Kidwell, M. C., Rabagliati, H., Mathur, M. B., Baranski, E., Buttrick, N., Chartier, C. R., Ebersole, C. R., Corker, K. S., Corley, M., Hartshorne, J. K., et al. (2020) · OSF Preprints (OSF Preprints)
Keeping a Low Profile: When Outcome Uncertainty Promotes Behavioral Inhibition
Deng, X., Xi, Y., & Huang, J. (2025) · Psychological Reports · doi:10.1177/00332941251410042
Choo, L. C. Y., Lei, Z., & Tang, W. (2026) · Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization · doi:10.1016/j.jebo.2026.107441
When Goods Were Odds: Do People Prefer Uncertain Goods After Uncertainty Is Resolved?
Hu, B., Yin, S., & Moon, A. (2026) · Journal of Consumer Research · doi:10.1093/jcr/ucag008
Magical thinking: atavism of evolution or a fundamental component of the mind?
Subbotsky, E. V. (2026) · Evolution and Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2026.106891
Le Tarıf Douanier Russo-Turc De 1782
Jamgocyan, O. (2025) · DSpace@29 Mayıs
The Belief in and Practice of Superstitions
Kowalski, R. M., Greco, C. R., McMullen, P., Ployhart, R., DeBrux, A., Ashmen, M., Rowley, M., Sanchez, I., Schaaf, A., Smith, G., et al. (2026) · Psychological Reports · doi:10.1177/00332941261479614
Latent Representation of Psychological Constructs in Large Language ModelsPreprint
Chen, J. (2026) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.7652158
Exploring the Impact of Nonlinearity on Effect Heterogeneity in Experimental Data
Fuenderich, J., Beinhauer, L. J., & Renkewitz, F. (2026) · Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/25152459261479656
Metadata
- Authors
- Risen, J. L., & Gilovich, T.
- Affiliations
- University of Chicago (US)
- Cornell University (US)
- Venue
- Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
- Published
- 2008-08
- Volume
- 95
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 293-307
- ISSN
- 0022-3514 (ISSN-L)
- 1939-1315
- OpenAlex
- W2158547509
- Cited by
- 138
- References
- 61
- Citations by year
- 2026: 6 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 15 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 8
- FWCI
- 3.65
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Personality and Social Psychology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Science Foundation (SES0542486; SES0241638)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › General Decision Sciences › Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Paranormal Experiences and Beliefs
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment
- Keywords
- magical beliefs, intuition, adverse outcomes, probability judgment, automatic cognition, belief in luck
- MeSH terms
- Culture, Female, Humans, Judgment, Male, Motivation, Negativism, Probability, Social Environment, Intuition
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review