Modeling multivariate effect sizes.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Multivariate meta-analysis requires within-study correlation statistics which are not available in any initially-identified studies.
“Multivariate meta‐analysis is the most common approach for addressing dependence among estimates (see Gleser & Olkin, 2009; Hedges & Olkin, 1985; Raudenbush, Becker, & Kalaian, 1988), but it requires within‐study correlation statistics (Becker, Hedges, & Pigott, 2004; Jackson, Riley, & White, 2011) which are not available for which are not available in any initially‐identified studies.”
From PROTOCOL: Single-track year-round education for improving academic achievement in us k-12 schools: results of a meta-analysis (2018) · cites this paper as Raudenbush, Becker, & Kalaian, 1988
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 7 · Cited by 195
- Authors
- Raudenbush, S. W., Becker, B. J., & Kalaian, H.
- Affiliations
- Michigan State University (US)
- ORCID
- Becker, Betsy Jane
- Venue
- Psychological Bulletin
- Published
- 1988
- Volume
- 103
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 111-120
- ISSN
- 0033-2909 (ISSN-L)
- 1939-1455
- OpenAlex
- W2013821232
- Cited by
- 195
- References
- 7
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 5
- FWCI
- 4.44
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Psychological Bulletin (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty › Meta-analysis and systematic reviews
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Psychology Research and Bibliometrics
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
- Keywords
- meta-analysis, multivariate meta-analysis, heterogeneity
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review