Analogue versus clinical depression: A critical reappraisal.

Vredenburg, Karel, Flett, Gordon L., Krames, Lester·1993·Psychological Bulletin

Abstract

Much of the existing psychological literature on depression is based on research with college students. An important question is whether depression in college students represents an appropriate analogue of depression in clinical patients. The purpose of the present article is to review past evidence on this issue from a critical perspective. Past arguments are examined, and little support is found for the position that depression research with college students is not warranted. Moreover, the results of studies with student and clinical samples are compared, and the findings are generally similar across populations. Next, a number of methodological issues are identified that may actually favor the use of depressed college students, and some methodological recommendations for future research are outlined. Finally, an appeal is made for research that directly examines the analogue-clinical issue and the nature of college student depression.

Cites (15)

  1. An inventory for measuring clinical anxiety: Psychometric properties.
    Beck, Aaron T., Epstein, Norman, Brown, Gary, Steer, Robert A. · 1988 · Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology
  2. The application of electronic computers to factor analysis
    Kaiser, Henry F. · 1960 · Educational and Psychological Measurement
  3. Learned helplessness in humans: Critique and reformulation.
    Abramson, Lyn Y., Seligman, Martin E., Teasdale, John D. · 1978 · Journal of Abnormal Psychology
  4. National Institute of Mental Health Diagnostic Interview Schedule: Its History, Characteristics, and Validity
    Robins, Lee N. · 1981 · Archives of General Psychiatry
  5. Tripartite model of anxiety and depression: psychometric evidence and taxonomic implications
    Clark, Lee Anna, Watson, David · 1991 · Journal of Abnormal Psychology
  6. The SCL-90 and the MMPI: A Step in the Validation of a New Self-Report Scale
    Derogatis, Leonard R., Rickels, Karl, Rock, Anthony F. · 1976 · British Journal of Psychiatry
  7. College sophomores in the laboratory: Influences of a narrow data base on social psychology's view of human nature.
    Sears, David O. · 1986 · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
  8. Conceptualization and Rationale for Consensus Definitions of Terms in Major Depressive Disorder: Remission, Recovery, Relapse, and Recurrence
    Frank, Ellen · 1991 · Archives of General Psychiatry
  9. Issues and recommendations regarding use of the Beck Depression Inventory
    Kendall, Philip C., Hollon, Steven D., Beck, Aaron T., Hammen, Constance L., Ingram, Rick E. · 1987 · Cognitive Therapy and Research
  10. Stress and adaptational outcomes. The problem of confounded measures
    Lazarus, Richard S., DeLongis, Anita, Folkman, Susan, Gruen, Rand · 1985 · American Psychologist

Show all 15 references

Cited by (25)

  1. The structure of negative emotional states: comparison of the depression anxiety stress scales (DASS) with the beck depression and anxiety inventories.
    Lovibond, P.F., Lovibond, S.H. · 1995 · Behaviour Research and Therapy
  2. Development of depression from preadolescence to young adulthood: Emerging gender differences in a 10-year longitudinal study
    Hankin, Benjamin L., Abramson, Lyn Y., Moffitt, Terrie E., Silva, Phil A., McGee, Rob, Angell, Kathryn E. · 1998 · Journal of Abnormal Psychology
  3. Psychometric properties of the Depression Anxiety Stress Scales (DASS) in clinical samples
    Brown, Timothy A., Chorpita, Bruce F., Korotitsch, William, Barlow, David H. · 1997 · Behaviour Research and Therapy
  4. A psychometric evaluation of the Beck Depression Inventory–II.
    Dozois, David J. A., Dobson, Keith S., Ahnberg, Jamie L. · 1998 · Psychological Assessment
  5. Development and Preliminary Validation of a Self-Report Measure of Psychopathic Personality Traits in Noncriminal Population
    Lilienfeld, Scott O., Andrews, Brian P. · 1996 · Journal of Personality Assessment

See all 219

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Analogue versus clinical depression: A critical reappraisal. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1037//0033-2909.113.2.327
The paper
Vredenburg, K., Flett, G. L., & Krames, L. (1993). Analogue versus clinical depression: A critical reappraisal. Psychological Bulletin. https://doi.org/10.1037//0033-2909.113.2.327

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.