College sophomores in the laboratory: Influences of a narrow data base on social psychology's view of human nature.

Abstract

For the 2 decades prior to 1960, published research in social psychology was based on a wide variety of subjects and research sites. Content analyses show that since then such research has overwhelmingly been based on college students tested in academic laboratories on academiclike tasks. How might this heavy dependence on one narrow data base have biased the main substantive conclusions of sociopsychological research in this era? Research on the full life span suggests that, compared with older adults, college students are likely to have less-crystallized attitudes, less-formulated senses of self, stronger cognitive skills, stronger tendencies to comply with authority, and more unstable peer group relationships. The laboratory setting is likely to exaggerate all these differences. These peculiarities of social psychology's predominant data base may have contributed to central elements of its portrait of human nature. According to this view people (a) are quite compliant and their behavior is easily socially influenced, (b) readily change their attitudes and (c) behave inconsistently with them, and (d) do not rest their self-perceptions on introspection. The narrow data base may also contribute to this portrait of human nature's (e) strong emphasis on cognitive processes and to its lack of emphasis on (f) personality dispositions, (g) material self-interest, (h) emotionally based irrationalities, (i) group norms, and (j) stage-specific phenomena. The analysis implies the need both for more careful examination of sociopsychological propositions for systematic biases introduced by dependence on this narrow data base and for increased reliance on adults tested in their natural habitats with materials drawn from ordinary life.

Cites (9)

1. Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases
   Tversky, Amos, Kahneman, Daniel · 1975 · Utility, Probability, and Human Decision Making
2. A theory of social comparison processes
   Festinger, Leon · 1954 · Human Relations
3. Telling more than we can know: Verbal reports on mental processes.
   Nisbett, Richard E., Wilson, Timothy D. · 1977 · Psychological Review
4. Feeling and thinking: Preferences need no inferences.
   Zajonc, R. B. · 1980 · American Psychologist
5. Cognitive, social, and physiological determinants of emotional state.
   Schachter, Stanley, Singer, Jerome · 1962 · Psychological Review
6. Self-Perception Theory
   Bem, Daryl J. · 1972 · Advances in Experimental Social Psychology
7. Cognitive consequences of forced compliance.
   Festinger, Leon, Carlsmith, James M. · 1959 · The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology
8. The principle of congruity in the prediction of attitude change.
   Osgood, Charles E., Tannenbaum, Percy H. · 1955 · Psychological Review
9. Conformity and character
   Crutchfield, Richard S. · 1955 · American Psychologist

Show all 9 references

Cited by (95)

1. The weirdest people in the world?
   Henrich, Joseph, Heine, Steven J., Norenzayan, Ara · 2010 · Behavioral and Brain Sciences
2. Amazon's Mechanical Turk: A New Source of Inexpensive, Yet High-Quality, Data?
   Buhrmester, Michael, Kwang, Tracy, Gosling, Samuel D. · 2011 · Perspectives on Psychological Science
3. A meta-analytic test of intergroup contact theory.
   Pettigrew, Thomas F., Tropp, Linda R. · 2006 · Journal of personality and social psychology
4. Rethinking individualism and collectivism: Evaluation of theoretical assumptions and meta-analyses.
   Oyserman, Daphna, Coon, Heather M., Kemmelmeier, Markus · 2002 · Psychological Bulletin
5. The self and social behavior in differing cultural contexts.
   Triandis, Harry C. · 1989 · Psychological Review

See all 2,048