Gender and the effectiveness of leaders: A meta-analysis.
Abstract
This article presents a synthesis of research on the relative effectiveness of women and men who occupy leadership and managerial roles. Aggregated over the organizational and laboratory experimental studies in the sample, male and female leaders were equally effective. However, consistent with the assumption that the congruence of leadership roles with leaders' gender enhances effectiveness, men were more effective than women in roles that were defined in more masculine terms, and women were more effective than men in roles that were defined in less masculine terms. Also, men were more effective than women to the extent that leader and subordinate roles were male-dominated numerically. These and other findings are discussed from the perspective of social-role theory of sex differences in social behavior as well as from alternative perspectives.
Cites (1)
- The measurement of experienced burnoutMaslach, Christina, Jackson, Susan E. · 1981 · Journal of Organizational Behavior
Cited by (36)
- Role congruity theory of prejudice toward female leaders.Eagly, Alice H., Karau, Steven J. · 2002 · Psychological Review
- Gender Differences in PreferencesCroson, Rachel, Gneezy, Uri · 2009 · Journal of Economic Literature
- The gender similarities hypothesis.Hyde, Janet Shibley · 2005 · American Psychologist
- A Social Identity Theory of LeadershipHogg, Michael A. · 2001 · Personality and Social Psychology Review
- One Hundred Years of Social Psychology Quantitatively DescribedRichard, F. D., Bond, Charles F., Stokes-Zoota, Juli J. · 2003 · Review of General Psychology
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Gender and the effectiveness of leaders: A meta-analysis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1037//0033-2909.117.1.125
- The paper
- Eagly, A. H., Karau, S. J., & Makhijani, M. G. (1995). Gender and the effectiveness of leaders: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin. https://doi.org/10.1037//0033-2909.117.1.125
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.