The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Mild head injury in children and adolescents: A review of studies (1970–1995).
Abstract
In this article, the authors provide a comprehensive review of the research of mild head injury in children and adolescents from 1970 to 1995. Because of marked variability in methodologies across studies, a preliminary box-score tally was computed, without regard to studies' scientific or methodological merit. These results revealed 13 adverse, 18 null, and 9 indeterminate findings related to neuropsychological, academic, or psychosocial outcome. When studies were classified based on methodological merit, the stronger studies were generally associated with null outcomes across domains. However, a few of the less stronger neuropsychological studies (5 of 40) reported subthreshold and transitory alterations during the early postinjury period. At the present time, cautious acceptance of the null hypothesis is recommended until more definitive studies are conducted that address the problems raised in this review.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“This investigation was limited to patients who had at least complicated mild or moderate TBI (as evidenced by the presence of intracranial lesions on neuroimaging), because uncomplicated mild TBI is typically not expected to be associated with significant lasting cognitive impairment in children who do not have compromised psychosocial backgrounds (Ponsford et al., 1999; Satz et al., 1997).”
From Criterion validity of the Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children–Fourth Edition after pediatric traumatic brain injury (2008) · cites this paper as Satz et al., 1997
Citations
Cites
Consequences of prejudice against the null hypothesis.
Greenwald, A. G. (1975) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/h0076157 · Cited by 1,022
Pathobiology of traumatically induced axonal injury in animals and man
Povlishock, J. T. (1993) · Annals of Emergency Medicine · doi:10.1016/s0196-0644(05)82738-6 · Cited by 236
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Neurocognitive outcomes and recovery after pediatric TBI: meta-analytic review of the literature
Babikian, T., & Asarnow, R. (2009) · Neuropsychology · doi:10.1037/a0015268 · Cited by 557
“They have, however, focused on a subsample of this population (e.g., mild injuries [Satz et al., 1997]) or on a specific cognitive domain (e.g., executive function [Levin & Hanten, 2005]).”
Self-citationReading Research for Students with LD
Swanson, H. L. (1999) · Journal of Learning Disabilities · doi:10.1177/002221949903200605 · Cited by 326
“Although not a synthesis of interventions specifically, Satz et al. (1997) found, in their comprehensive review of children and adolescents with mild head injury, that when compared to control”
BackgroundKirkwood, M. W., Yeates, K. O., & Wilson, P. E. (2006) · PEDIATRICS · doi:10.1542/peds.2005-0994 · Cited by 336
Long-Term Consequences: Effects on Normal Development Profile After Concussion
Daneshvar, D. H., Riley, D., Nowinski, C. J., McKee, A. C., Stern, R. A., & Cantu, R. C. (2011) · Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Clinics of North America · doi:10.1016/j.pmr.2011.08.009 · Cited by 316
The effect of pediatric traumatic brain injury on behavioral outcomes: a systematic review
Li, L., & Liu, J.-H. (2012) · Developmental Medicine & Child Neurology · doi:10.1111/j.1469-8749.2012.04414.x · Cited by 281
“Studies were rated using a scale modified from Cappa et al.23 and following recommendations by Satz et al.18 Scores (yes=1; no=0) were given for criteria reflecting a study’s design, sample, and measures.”
BackgroundMethod
Metadata
- Authors
- Satz, P., Zaucha, K., McCleary, C., Light, R., Asarnow, R., & Becker, D.
- Affiliations
- University of California, Los Angeles (US)
- Venue
- Psychological Bulletin
- Published
- 1997
- Volume
- 122
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 107-131
- ISSN
- 0033-2909 (ISSN-L)
- 1939-1455
- OpenAlex
- W2039083624
- Cited by
- 245
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 57 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 5
- FWCI
- 4.31
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Psychological Bulletin (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (P50NS030308, R01 NS26801, P50 NS30308-02, R01NS026801)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Clinical Neurology › Traumatic Brain Injury Research
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Clinical Neurology › Traumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular Disturbances
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Automotive and Human Injury Biomechanics
- Keywords
- mild traumatic brain injury, concussion, children, adolescents, neuropsychological outcomes, educational outcomes, psychosocial outcomes, methodological quality, null hypothesis
- MeSH terms
- Achievement, Adolescent, Brain Damage, Chronic, Child, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Neuropsychological Tests, Social Adjustment, Head Injuries, Closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
