The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Cultural psychology, a new look: Reply to Bond (2002), Fiske (2002), Kitayama (2002), and Miller (2002).
Abstract
M. H. Bond (2002), A. P. Fiske (2002), S. Kitayama (2002), and J. G. Miller (2002) joined D. Oyserman, H. M. Coon, and M. Kemmelmeier (2002) in highlighting limitations of the individualism-collectivism model of culture. Concern is warranted; nevertheless, individualism-collectivism helps structure discourse on the influence of culture on the mind. To avoid level-of-analysis entanglements, Oyserman et al. propose an integrative model that includes distal, proximal, and situated cultural features of societies and internalized models of these features, highlights the importance of subjective construal, and uses evolutionary perspectives to clarify the basic problems cultures address. Framed this way, it is clear that, depending on situational requirements, both individualism- and collectivism-focused strategies are adaptive; thus, it is likely that human minds have adapted to think both ways.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Rethinking individualism and collectivism: Evaluation of theoretical assumptions and meta-analyses.
Oyserman, D., Coon, H. M., & Kemmelmeier, M. (2002) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.128.1.3 · Cited by 5,758
Self-citationKitayama, S. (2002) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.128.1.89 · Cited by 465
Cited by
Autonomy and Relatedness in Cultural Context: Implications for Self and Family
Kagitcibasi, C. (2005) · Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology · doi:10.1177/0022022105275959 · Cited by 1,345
Kühnen, U., & Oyserman, D. (2002) · Journal of Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/s0022-1031(02)00011-2 · Cited by 451
Self-citationConnecting and separating mind-sets: Culture as situated cognition.
Oyserman, D., Sorensen, N., Reber, R., & Chen, S. X. (2009) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0015850 · Cited by 285
Self-citationLim, K. H., Leung, K., Sia, C. L., & Lee, M. K. (2004) · Journal of International Business Studies · doi:10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8400104 · Cited by 279
Cross‐national job stress: a quantitative and qualitative study
Liu, C., Spector, P. E., & Shi, L. (2007) · Journal of Organizational Behavior · doi:10.1002/job.435 · Cited by 265
Metadata
- Authors
- Oyserman, D., Kemmelmeier, M., & Coon, H. M.
- Venue
- Psychological Bulletin
- Published
- 2002
- Volume
- 128
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 110-117
- ISSN
- 0033-2909 (ISSN-L)
- 1939-1455
- OpenAlex
- W2035682765
- Cited by
- 201
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 12.98
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Cultural psychology, a new look: Reply to Bond (2002), Fiske (2002), Kitayama (2002), and Miller (2002). https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1037/0033-2909.128.1.110
- The paper
- Oyserman, D., Kemmelmeier, M., & Coon, H. M. (2002). Cultural psychology, a new look: Reply to Bond (2002), Fiske (2002), Kitayama (2002), and Miller (2002). Psychological Bulletin. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.128.1.110
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
