Analysis of multiplicative combination rules when the causal variables are measured with error
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Linear models are generally found to account quite well for psychological data, even when the data set is known to have been generated by a multiplicative model.
“It is not clear why significant interactions failed to emerge in these studies, but it is worth noting that linear models are generally found to account quite well for psychological data, even when the data set is known to have been generated by a multiplicative model (Bimbaum, 1972;Busemeyer & Jones, 1983).”
From The theory of planned behavior (1991) · cites this paper as Busemeyer & Jones, 1983
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037//0022-3514.51.6.1173 · Cited by 91,542 · see citing works
The theory of planned behavior
Ajzen, I. (1991) · Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes · doi:10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-t · Cited by 90,587 · see citing works
“Voting choice, of course, poses no problems in terms of volitional control, and perceptions”
BackgroundBaron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.51.6.1173 · Cited by 91,532 · see citing works
Chin, W. W., Marcolin, B. L., & Newsted, P. R. (2003) · Information Systems Research · doi:10.1287/isre.14.2.189.16018 · Cited by 6,479 · see citing works
Testing moderator and mediator effects in counseling psychology research.
Frazier, P. A., Tix, A. P., & Barron, K. E. (2004) · Journal of Counseling Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-0167.51.1.115 · Cited by 4,037 · see citing works
Intention—Behavior Relations: A Conceptual and Empirical Review
Sheeran, P. (2002) · European Review of Social Psychology · doi:10.1080/14792772143000003 · Cited by 3,688 · see citing works
Statistical difficulties of detecting interactions and moderator effects.
McClelland, G. H., & Judd, C. M. (1993) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.114.2.376 · Cited by 3,270 · see citing works
Rueger, S. Y., Malecki, C. K., Pyun, Y., Aycock, C., & Coyle, S. (2016) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/bul0000058 · Cited by 946 · see citing works
Issues and Challenges in Studying Parental Control: Toward a New Conceptualization
Grolnick, W. S., & Pomerantz, E. M. (2009) · Child Development Perspectives · doi:10.1111/j.1750-8606.2009.00099.x · Cited by 601 · see citing works
Designing, testing, and interpreting interactions and moderator effects in family research
Whisman, M. A., & McClelland, G. H. (2005) · Journal of Family Psychology · doi:10.1037/0893-3200.19.1.111 · Cited by 421 · see citing works
Blake, K. R., & Gangestad, S. (2020) · Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin · doi:10.1177/0146167220913363 · Cited by 159 · see citing works
Relating alternative forms of contingency fit to the appropriate methods to test them
Burkert, M., Davila, A., Mehta, K., & Oyon, D. (2014) · Management Accounting Research · doi:10.1016/j.mar.2013.07.008 · Cited by 87 · see citing works
- Authors
- Busemeyer, J. R., & Jones, L. E.
- Affiliations
- Indiana University – Purdue University Indianapolis (US)
- ORCID
- Busemeyer, Jerome R.
- Venue
- Psychological Bulletin
- Published
- 1983-05
- Volume
- 93
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 549-562
- ISSN
- 0033-2909 (ISSN-L)
- 1939-1455
- OpenAlex
- W2013267907
- Cited by
- 448
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 16 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 18 · 2018: 17 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 14 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 14 · 2013: 17 · 2012: 11
- FWCI
- 5.86
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Psychological Bulletin (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
- Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Advanced Causal Inference Techniques
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Bayesian Modeling and Causal Inference
- Keywords
- causal factors, measurement error, error propagation, causal models
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review