Cited by 448Psychometric Methodologies and TestingAdvanced Causal Inference TechniquesBayesian Modeling and Causal Inference

Analysis of multiplicative combination rules when the causal variables are measured with error

Busemeyer, Jerome R., Jones, Lawrence E.·1983·Psychological Bulletin

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/0033-2909.93.3.549

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Linear models are generally found to account quite well for psychological data, even when the data set is known to have been generated by a multiplicative model.

    “It is not clear why significant interactions failed to emerge in these studies, but it is worth noting that linear models are generally found to account quite well for psychological data, even when the data set is known to have been generated by a multiplicative model (Bimbaum, 1972;Busemeyer & Jones, 1983).”

    From The theory of planned behavior (1991) · cites this paper as Busemeyer & Jones, 1983

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Busemeyer, J. R., & Jones, L. E.
Affiliations
Indiana University – Purdue University Indianapolis (US)
Venue
Psychological Bulletin
Published
1983-05
Volume
93
Issue
3
Pages
549-562
ISSN
  • 0033-2909 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-1455
OpenAlex
W2013267907
Cited by
448
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 16 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 18 · 2018: 17 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 14 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 14 · 2013: 17 · 2012: 11
FWCI
5.86
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Psychological Bulletin (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Advanced Causal Inference Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Bayesian Modeling and Causal Inference
Keywords
causal factors, measurement error, error propagation, causal models

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review